Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26546402›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a French multicenter retrospective study (GFPC 0802 study).

C Raynaud, L Greillier, J Mazieres, I Monnet, B Mastroianni, G Robinet, G Fraboulet, A Dixmier, H Berard, R Lamy and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Version 3.2016.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Surgical therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

C RaynaudService de Pneumologie, CH Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France. christine.raynaud@ch-argenteuil.fr.
L GreillierService d'oncologie thoracique, APHM, Marseille, Services de Pneumologie, Marseille, France. laurent.greillier@ap-hm.fr.
J MazieresCHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France. mazieres.j@chu-toulouse.fr.
I MonnetService de pneumologie, CHI Créteil, 40 avenue de verdun, 94010, Créteil, France. isabelle.monnet@chicreteil.fr.
B MastroianniCHU Lyon, Lyon, France. benedicte.mastroianni@hcl.fr.
G RobinetCHU Brest, Brest, France. gilles.robinet@chu-brest.fr.
G FrabouletCH Cergy Pontoise, Cergy Pontoise, France. gislaine.fraboulet@ch-pontoise.fr.
A DixmierCH d'Orléans, Orléans, France. adrien.dixmier@chu-orleans.fr.
H BerardHIA Toulon, Toulon, France. hlberard@orange.fr.
R LamyCH Lorient, Lorient, France. regine.lamy@orange.fr.
J LetreutCH Aix en Provence, Aix en Provence, France. jletreut@ch-aix.fr.
H LenaCHU Rennes, Rennes, France. herve.lena@chu-rennes.fr.
G OlivieroCH Longjumeau, Longjumeau, France. gerard.oliviero@ch-longjumeau.fr.
S BottaCHU Rouen, Rouen, France. suzanna.botta@chu-rouen.fr.
A VergnenegreCHU Limoges, Limoges, France. alain.vergnenegre@unilim.fr.
I BorgetIGR, Villejuif, France. isabelle.borget@igr.fr.
C ChouaidService de pneumologie, CHI Créteil, 40 avenue de verdun, 94010, Créteil, France. christos.chouaid@chicreteil.fr.
Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FRCentre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy · FRLaboratoire d'études sur les monothéismes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with poor prognosis in spite of significant improvement in survival, due to new chemotherapy regimens. We describe here patients' profiles and management in daily practice in France.

methodsObservational retrospective study. Data were collected from medical files. All patients with histologically proven MPM diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2008 were included in the participating sites.

resultsFour hundred and six patients were included in 37 sites: mean age 68.9 ± 9.8 years, male predominance (sex ratio 3.27), latency of the disease 45.7 years, epithelioïd type 83 %. Diagnosis was made using thoracoscopy in 80.8 % of patients. Radical surgery was performed in 6.2 % of cases. Chemotherapy was administered to 74.6 % of patients. First line regimens consisted mainly of platinum + pemetrexed (91 %) or pemetrexed alone (7 %). Objective response rate was 17.2 % and another 41.6 % of patients experienced disease stabilization. Half of these patients underwent second line chemotherapy (platinium + pemetrexed 31.6 %, pemetrexed alone 24.6 %), resulting in a 6 % response rate. Third-line chemotherapy (56 patients) yielded disease control in 5.4 % of cases.

conclusionsThe management of MPM in France is usually in accordance with guidelines. Response rates are somewhat lower than those described in clinical trials.

Indexed as

AgedDisease ManagementFemaleFranceHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePleural NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26546402
PMCPMC4635998
OpenAlexW2157366919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.