ArticleJournal of digital imaging2016
Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The self-reported use of immunostains and cytogenetic testing in the diagnosis of melanoma by practicing U.S. pathologists of 10 selected states.Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2016Trial
- Basic Principles of Skin Biopsy Optimization in Dermatopathology.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dermatopathology of Malignant Melanoma in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Single Institutional Experience.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization of multiple diagnostic terms in melanocytic skin lesion pathology reports.Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: New Insights and Perspectives.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry and Digital Pathology as the Foundation for Next-Generation Pathology in Melanoma: Methodological Comparison and Future Clinical Applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Pathologists' agreement on treatment suggestions for melanocytic skin lesions.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2020Article
- Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Validation of Whole-slide Digitally Imaged Melanocytic Lesions: Does Z-Stack Scanning Improve Diagnostic Accuracy?Journal of pathology informatics · 2019Article
- Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2018Article
- Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2018Article
- Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Article
- RecutClub.com: An Open Source, Whole Slide Image-based Pathology Education System.Journal of pathology informatics · 2017Article
- Variation among pathologists' treatment suggestions for melanocytic lesions: A survey of pathologists.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists' practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists' experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists' use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62%) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71%). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41%, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71%), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44%). Most respondents (77%) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59% agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78% of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49%) or not (51%). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.