Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26546178›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2016

Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology.

Tracy Onega, Lisa M Reisch, Paul D Frederick, Berta M Geller, Heidi D Nelson, Jason P Lott, Andrea C Radick, David E Elder, Raymond L Barnhill, Michael W Piepkorn and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Basic Principles of Skin Biopsy Optimization in Dermatopathology.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pathologists' agreement on treatment suggestions for melanocytic skin lesions.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Tracy OnegaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Department of Epidemiology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. Tracy.L.Onega@dartmouth.edu.
Lisa M ReischUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul D FrederickUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Berta M GellerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Vermont Burlington, Burlington, VT, USA.
Heidi D NelsonOregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Jason P LottYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Andrea C RadickUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David E ElderHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Raymond L BarnhillDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Michael W PiepkornDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joann G ElmoreDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USCotton (United States) · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USInstitut Curie · FROregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Vermont · USYale University · US

Funding

Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Melanoma & the Impact of Double ReadingR01CA151306 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELMORE, JOANN G · 2011 to 2015
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists' practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists' experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists' use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62%) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71%). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41%, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71%), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44%). Most respondents (77%) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59% agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78% of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49%) or not (51%). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.

Indexed as

MicroscopyHumansMedulloblastomaObserver VariationPathology, ClinicalSkinUser-Computer InterfaceDermatopathologyDigital whole slide imagingMelanocytic lesions

Identifiers

PMID26546178
PMCPMC4788620
OpenAlexW2232756102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.