Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26546160›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Development of a fluorescence-based multiplex genotyping method for simultaneous determination of human papillomavirus infections and viral loads.

Zhengrong Sun, Rong Zhang, Zhonghua Liu, Chao Liu, Xiulin Li, Weiqiang Zhou, Lianxia Yang, Qiang Ruan, Xu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Virulence · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Concurrent Detection of Chelonid Alphaherpesvirus 5 andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhengrong SunVirus Laboratory, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China. sunzr@sj-hospital.org.
Rong ZhangJiangsu Bioperfectus Technologies Limited Company, Jiangsu, 225300, China. zhangrong129@163.com.
Zhonghua LiuJiangsu Bioperfectus Technologies Limited Company, Jiangsu, 225300, China. liuzhonghua@s-sbio.com.
Chao LiuVirus Laboratory, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China. henryliu17@hotmail.com.
Xiulin LiJiangsu Bioperfectus Technologies Limited Company, Jiangsu, 225300, China. xiulinli@hotmail.com.
Weiqiang ZhouVirus Laboratory, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China. zhgrw@126.com.
Lianxia YangVirus Laboratory, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China. 19670445@qq.com.
Qiang RuanVirus Laboratory, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China. ruanq@sj-hospital.org.
Xu ZhangJiangsu Bioperfectus Technologies Limited Company, Jiangsu, 225300, China. xuzhang@s-sbio.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is correlated with an increased risk of developing intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM). The aims of the current study is to establish a method named BioPerfectus Multiplex Real Time (BMRT) HPV assay for simultaneous typing and quantifying HPVs, and to evaluate it by comparison with HPV GenoArray test and PCR-sequencing method, as well as histological status.

methodsA total of 817 cervical specimens were evaluated by BMRT method and HPV GenoArray test, using PCR-sequencing method as the reference standard; simultaneously, high-risk HPV-16 and -18 DNA loads were assessed in 443 specimens to investigate the correlation with infection outcomes.

resultsThe overall detection coincidence rate between BMRT assay and HPV GenoArray test is 96.6 % and the Kappa value is 0.760. In addition, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of BMRT is 98.4 % and 95.7 % compared with the results detected by PCR-sequencing method, respectively. HPV-16 viral load has a correlation with CINs or worse lesions. By comparing with infected women presenting NILM /cervicitis, the cutoff value for HPV-16 from patients with CINs was 0.827. With this cutoff value, 74.6 % sensitivity and 72.5 % specificity for prediction of HPV-16 infected patients with CINI and higher CIN were achieved. High significance was obtained when comparing the infected women presenting NILM/cervicitis with women either with CIN and cervical carcinomas (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe BMRT assay seemed to be a good alternative approach for HR-HPV testing, due to its high level of automation and ability to quantify HPV-16, HPV-18 and other HR-HPVs.

Indexed as

GenotypeViral LoadAlphapapillomavirusCervix UteriDNA, ViralFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPapillomavirus InfectionsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical DysplasiaDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID26546160
PMCPMC4635533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.