Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26545986›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Baseline characteristics, analysis plan and report on feasibility for the Prevention Of Decline in Cognition After Stroke Trial (PODCAST).

Polly Scutt, Dan Blackburn, Kailash Krishnan, Clive Ballard, Alistair Burns, Gary A Ford, Jonathan Mant, Peter Passmore, Stuart Pocock, John Reckless and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Polly ScuttStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, City Hospital campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1 PB, UK. polly.scutt@nottingham.ac.uk.
Dan BlackburnSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, 385A Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2HQ, UK. d.blackburn@sheffield.ac.uk.
Kailash KrishnanStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, City Hospital campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1 PB, UK. kailash.krishnan@nottingham.ac.uk.
Clive BallardWolfson Center for Age-Related Diseases, Wolfson Wing, Hodgkin Building, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK. clive.ballard@kcl.ac.uk.
Alistair BurnsFaculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Institute of Brain, Behavior and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9NT, UK. alistair.burns@manchester.ac.uk.
Gary A FordMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. gary.ford@ouh.nhs.uk.
Jonathan MantGeneral Practice & Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Forvie Site, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. jm677@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Peter PassmoreInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Queens University, Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Block B, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK. p.passmore@qub.ac.uk.
Stuart PocockDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. stuart.pocock@lshtm.ac.uk.
John RecklessDepartment of Endocrinology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK. mpsjpdr@bath.ac.uk.
Nikola SpriggStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, City Hospital campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1 PB, UK. nikola.sprigg@nottingham.ac.uk.
Rob StewartKing's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), Department of Psychological Medicine (Box 63), De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. r.stewart@iop.kcl.ac.uk.
Joanna M WardlawCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. joanna.wardlaw@ed.ac.uk.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, City Hospital campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1 PB, UK. philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA common complication after stroke is development of cognitive impairment and dementia. However, effective strategies for reducing the risk of developing these problems remain undefined. Potential strategies include intensive lowering of blood pressure (BP) and/or lipids. This paper summarises the baseline characteristics, statistical analysis plan and feasibility of a randomised control trial of blood pressure and lipid lowering in patients post-stroke with the primary objective of reducing cognitive impairment and dementia.

methodsThe Prevention Of Decline in Cognition After Stroke Trial (PODCAST) was a multi-centre prospective randomised open-label blinded-endpoint controlled partial-factorial internal pilot trial running in secondary and primary care. Participants without dementia were enrolled 3-7 months post ischaemic stroke or spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, and randomised to intensive versus guideline BP lowering (target systolic BP <125 mmHg versus <140 mmHg); patients with ischaemic stroke were also randomised to intensive or guideline lipid lowering (target LDL cholesterol <1.4 mmol/L versus <3 mmol/L). The primary outcome was the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised; a key secondary outcome was to assess feasibility of performing a large trial of one or both interventions. Data are number (%) or mean (standard deviation). The trial was planned to last for 8 years with follow-up between 1 and 8 years. The plan for reporting the main results is included as Additional file 2.

results83 patients (of a planned 600) were recruited from 19 UK sites between 7 October 2010 and 31 January 2014. Delays, due to difficulties in the provision of excess treatment costs and to complexity of follow-up, led to few centres taking part and a much lower recruitment rate than planned. Patient characteristics at baseline were: age 74 (SD 7) years, male 64 (77 %), index stroke ischaemic 77 (93 %), stroke onset to randomisation 4.5 [SD 1.3] months, Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised 86 (of 100, SD 8), Montreal Cognitive Assessment 24 (of 30, SD 3), BP 147/82 (SD 19/11) mmHg, total cholesterol 4.0 (SD 0.8) mmol/L and LDL cholesterol 2.0 (SD 0.7) mmol/L, modified Rankin Scale 1.1 (SD 0.8).

conclusionLimited recruitment suggests that a large trial is not feasible using the current protocol. The effects of the interventions on BP, lipids, and cognition will be reported in the main publication.

trial registrationISRCTN85562386 registered on 23 September 2009.

Indexed as

CognitionStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersBlood PressureCholesterol, LDLClinical ProtocolsCognition DisordersDementiaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHypolipidemic AgentsMaleAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26545986
PMCPMC4636808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.