Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26545980›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2015

The outcome and prognostic factors for lymph node recurrence after node-sparing definitive external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Yu-Jen Wang, Chao-Yuan Huang, Wei-Hsien Hou, Chia-Chun Wang, Keng-Hsueh Lan, Chung-Hsin Chen, Hong-Jen Yu, Ming-Kuen Lai, Ann-Lii Cheng, Shihh-Ping Liu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prospective intra-individual blinded comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  3. The Role of Tumor Oxygenation Tested by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Prostate Cancer Grading.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Jen WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 14294@s.tmu.edu.tw.
Chao-Yuan HuangDepartments of Urology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. cyhuang0909@ntu.edu.tw.
Wei-Hsien HouDivision of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. houtommy@gmail.com.
Chia-Chun WangDivision of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. chiachun@gmail.com.
Keng-Hsueh LanDivision of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. KENGHSUEH.LAN@gmail.com.
Chung-Hsin ChenDepartments of Urology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. mufasachen@gmail.com.
Hong-Jen YuDepartments of Urology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. yhj5251@mtu.edu.tw.
Ming-Kuen LaiDepartments of Urology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. mingkuen2002@gmail.com.
Ann-Lii ChengDepartments of Oncology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. alcheng@ntu.edu.tw.
Shihh-Ping LiuDepartments of Urology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. spliu@mtuh.gov.tw.
Yeong-Shiau PuDepartments of Urology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. yspu@ntu.edu.tw.
Jason Chia-Hsien ChengDivision of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. jasoncheng@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic factors for the recurrence of lymph node (LN) metastasis after dose-escalated radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer patients have not been well investigated. We report the prognostic factors and outcomes in patients receiving salvage treatment for LN recurrence after high-dose intensity-modulated RT (IMRT).

methodsWe studied a cohort of 419 patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma undergoing definitive IMRT (78 Gy). LN recurrence was diagnosed by size criteria using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging, or abnormal uptake of (18)F-fluorocholine by LNs on positron emission tomography/CT. Overall survival and LN recurrence-free survival (LNRFS) were calculated, and prognostic factors were evaluated.

resultsWith a median follow-up of 60 months, 18 patients (4.3 %) had LN recurrence and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival rate (60 vs. 90 %, p = 0.003). Univariate analysis showed that T3/T4 stage (p = 0.003), Gleason score >7 (p < 0.001), and estimated risk of pelvic LN involvement of >30 % by the Roach formula (p = 0.029) were associated with significantly lower LNRFS. On multivariate analysis, high Gleason score (hazard ratio = 5.99, p = 0.007) was the only independent factor. The 1/2-year overall survivals after LN recurrence were 67/54 %. Patients with isolated LN recurrence (p = 0.003), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time >5 months (p = 0.009), interval between PSA nadir and biochemical failure >12 months (p = 0.035), and PSA <10 ng/ml at LN recurrence (p = 0.003) had significantly better survival. Patients with isolated LN recurrence had significantly better survival when treated with combined RT and hormones than when treated with hormones alone (p = 0.011).

conclusionsGleason score of >7 may predict LN recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with definitive IMRT. Small number of patients limits the extrapolation of this risk with the primary treatment strategy. Combined RT and hormones may prolong survival in patients with isolated LN recurrence.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSalvage TherapySurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26545980
PMCPMC4636763
OpenAlexW2173028071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.