GuidelineHerz2015
[ESC guidelines 2015. Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome].
Guideline in Herz, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and treatment compliance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in France, the STOP SCA+ study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Transcoronary pacing in an animal model : Second coated guidewire versus cutaneous patch as indifferent electrodes.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes of Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With and Without Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Transcoronary pacing : Reliability during myocardial ischemia and after implantation of a coronary stent.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
- Predicting risk of cardiovascular events 1 to 3 years post-myocardial infarction using a global registry.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
- The double guidewire approach for transcoronary pacing in a porcine model.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In August 2015 the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published new guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation, which incorporate the scientific progress since 2011. The innovation with probably the most impact on the clinical practice is the introduction of 0 h/1 h protocols for exclusion or inclusion of myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation. These 0 h/1 h protocols are equally recommended to the established 0 h/3 h protocol. For these protocols blood is drawn on admission and 1 h later and the troponin level is analyzed by means of highly sensitive troponin assays. Troponin cut-off values were validated in several large studies, therefore, now facilitating a faster exclusion of myocardial infarction with an equal negative predictive value to 3 h protocols. Additionally, access via the radial artery is recommended over a femoral artery access for coronary angiography and when necessary the subsequent coronary intervention. Other novel aspects apply to the anti-ischemic and anti-thrombotic medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26545604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.