Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26545384›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2015

Colorectal surgery in a rural setting.

Giovanni Domenico Tebala

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Providers' and survivors' perspectives on the availability and accessibility of surgery in gastrointestinal cancer care.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Multidisciplinary treatment of cancer.Updates in surgery · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giovanni Domenico TebalaColorectal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Noble's Hospital, Strang, Isle of Man, IM4 4RJ, UK. Giovanni.Tebala@nobles.dhss.gov.im.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-4096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal surgery is increasingly being concentrated in high-volume tertiary centers, whereas it has been demonstrated that it can be performed safely and effectively even in low-volume hospitals. We analyzed data of patients who underwent major colorectal surgery in 1 year in a "rural" hospital, located on a small island, where a dynamic colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an enhanced recovery programme have been implemented. Primary endpoints were rate of laparoscopic resections, morbidity, mortality and number of lymph nodes retrieved and examined. Secondary endpoints were rate of R0 resections and length of postoperative stay. Seventy-six patients had surgery for a severe colorectal condition. Fifty-five resections have been performed, 38 by laparoscopy (69.1 %). Conversion rate was 5 %. Morbidity for resections was 21.8 %. General leak rate was 1.8 %, no leaks in laparoscopic resections. There was no difference in morbidity between open and laparoscopic resections. Postoperative stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopic vs open operations and in elective vs emergency operations. Number of lymph nodes retrieved was higher in laparoscopic vs open resections, 85.4 % of patients had 12 or more lymph nodes examined. Overall rate of R0 resections was 80.5 %, higher in laparoscopic vs open resections. Major colorectal surgery can be performed safely and effectively also in low-volume hospitals in the presence of a trained high-volume surgeon, an effective MDT and an Enhanced Recovery Programme.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesAgedColorectal NeoplasmsConversion to Open SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresElective Surgical ProceduresEmergenciesFemaleHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLymph Node ExcisionMaleUnited KingdomColorectal cancerColorectal resectionsColorectal surgeryLaparoscopic colorectal surgeryRural hospital

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.