Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26545381›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2016

Concomitant corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) for the symptomatic management of allergic rhinitis.

Shaoyan Feng, Yunping Fan, Zibin Liang, Renqiang Ma, Wanwei Cao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Focused allergic rhinitis practice parameter for Canada.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaoyan FengDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 52, Meihua East Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai, 519020, China.
Yunping FanDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 52, Meihua East Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai, 519020, China. 13926927889@139.com.
Zibin LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Renqiang MaAllergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolarygology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wanwei CaoDepartment of Pathology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the symptomatic management of corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) with that of either therapy given alone, or placebo in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). The PRISMA guidelines for meta-analysis reporting were followed. Total nasal symptom scores and individual nasal symptom scores were pooled after assessing heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimates were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD) between treatments. A total of ten studies fulfilled eligibility. Three trials studied the combination therapy of corticosteroid nasal spray and oral antihistamine. Pooled results of two trials failed to show significant difference on total nasal symptoms between combination therapy and intranasal corticosteroid alone (WMD = -0.20, 95 % CI -0.38 to -0.01, P = 0.04). The qualitative analysis showed that combination therapy has greater efficacy than oral antihistamines alone or placebo in improving symptoms. Seven trials investigated corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine nasal spray. The cumulative meta-analysis of six RCTs revealed that combination therapy was superior to solo intranasal corticosteroid (WMD = -1.16, 95 % CI -1.49 to -0.83, P < 0.00001), solo intranasal antihistamine (WMD = -1.73, 95 % CI -2.08 to -1.38, P < 0.00001), and placebo (WMD = -2.81, 95 % CI -3.16 to -2.47, P < 0.00001) in improving total nasal symptom scores. Intranasal corticosteroid plus oral antihistamine have similar efficacy to intranasal corticosteroid alone, greater efficacy than oral antihistamines alone or placebo in reducing nasal symptoms for AR patients. Intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine are significantly superior to either therapy given alone, or placebo.

Indexed as

Nasal SpraysAdministration, IntranasalAdrenal Cortex HormonesAerosolsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHistamine AntagonistsHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhinitis, AllergicRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalAdrenal Cortex HormonesAerosolsHistamine AntagonistsHistamine H1 AntagonistsNasal SpraysAllergic rhinitisAntihistamineCorticosteroid nasal sprayEfficacy

Identifiers

PMID26545381
OpenAlexW2169432118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.