Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26545099›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Network Plasticity as Bayesian Inference.

David Kappel, Stefan Habenschuss, Robert Legenstein, Wolfgang Maass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stability through plasticity: Finding robust memories through representational drift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Distributed and drifting signals for working memory load in human cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unraveling the mysteries of dendritic spine dynamics: Five key principles shaping memory and cognition.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Natural gradient enables fast sampling in spiking neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022
    Article
  16. Bayesian continual learningFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David KappelInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Stefan HabenschussInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Robert LegensteinInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Wolfgang MaassInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General results from statistical learning theory suggest to understand not only brain computations, but also brain plasticity as probabilistic inference. But a model for that has been missing. We propose that inherently stochastic features of synaptic plasticity and spine motility enable cortical networks of neurons to carry out probabilistic inference by sampling from a posterior distribution of network configurations. This model provides a viable alternative to existing models that propose convergence of parameters to maximum likelihood values. It explains how priors on weight distributions and connection probabilities can be merged optimally with learned experience, how cortical networks can generalize learned information so well to novel experiences, and how they can compensate continuously for unforeseen disturbances of the network. The resulting new theory of network plasticity explains from a functional perspective a number of experimental data on stochastic aspects of synaptic plasticity that previously appeared to be quite puzzling.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyComputer SimulationNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeurons

Identifiers

PMID26545099
PMCPMC4636322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.