Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26544704›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2015

Does rapid HIV disease progression prior to combination antiretroviral therapy hinder optimal CD4+ T-cell recovery once HIV-1 suppression is achieved?

Inma Jarrin, Nikos Pantazis, Judith Dalmau, Andrew N Phillips, Ashley Olson, Cristina Mussini, Faroudy Boufassa, Dominique Costagliola, Kholoud Porter, Juliá Blanco and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Polymorphism rs1385129 Within Glut1 GeneFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Inma JarrinaInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain bAthens University Medical School, Athens, Greece cAIDS Research Institute IrsiCaixa, Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain dResearch Department of Infection and Population Health eMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK fInstitute of Infectious Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy gInserm, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Epidemiology of HIV and STI Team, Le Kremlin Bicetre hUniv Paris-Sud, Le Kremlim Bicetre iUPMC Univ Paris 06 jINSERM, Paris, France kUniversitat de Vic-Central de Catalunya, UVIC-UCC, Vic lInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain. *Julia Del Amo and Javier Martinez-Picado are senior coauthors of this work.
Nikos Pantazis
Judith Dalmau
Andrew N Phillips
Ashley Olson
Cristina Mussini
Faroudy Boufassa
Dominique Costagliola
Kholoud Porter
Juliá Blanco
Julia Del Amo
Javier Martinez-Picado
for CASCADE Collaboration in EuroCoord

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article compares trends in CD4 T-cell recovery and proportions achieving optimal restoration (≥500 cells/μl) after viral suppression following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) initiation between rapid and nonrapid progressors.

methodsWe included HIV-1 seroconverters achieving viral suppression within 6 months of cART. Rapid progressors were individuals experiencing at least one CD4 less than 200 cells/μl within 12 months of seroconverters before cART. We used piecewise linear mixed models and logistic regression for optimal restoration.

resultsOf 4024 individuals, 294 (7.3%) were classified as rapid progressors. At the same CD4 T-cell count at cART start (baseline), rapid progressors experienced faster CD4 T-cell increases than nonrapid progressors in first month [difference (95% confidence interval) in mean increase/month (square root scale): 1.82 (1.61; 2.04)], which reversed to slightly slower increases in months 1-18 [-0.05 (-0.06; -0.03)] and no significant differences in 18-60 months [-0.003 (-0.01; 0.01)]. Percentage achieving optimal restoration was significantly lower for rapid progressors than nonrapid progressors at months 12 (29.2 vs. 62.5%) and 36 (47.1 vs. 72.4%) but not at month 60 (70.4 vs. 71.8%). These differences disappeared after adjusting for baseline CD4 T-cell count: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.86 (0.61; 1.20), 0.90 (0.38; 2.17) and 1.56 (0.55; 4.46) at months 12, 36 and 60, respectively.

conclusionAmong people on suppressive antiretroviral therapy, rapid progressors experience faster initial increases of CD4 T-cell counts than nonrapid progressors, but are less likely to achieve optimal restoration during the first 36 months after cART, mainly because of lower CD4 T-cell counts at cART initiation.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveViral LoadAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsYoung AdultAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID26544704
PMCPMC5629982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.