Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26544700›Full record

Observational studyAIDS (London, England)2015

The risk of viral rebound in the year after delivery in women remaining on antiretroviral therapy.

Susie Huntington, Claire Thorne, Marie-Louise Newell, Jane Anderson, Graham P Taylor, Deenan Pillay, Teresa Hill, Pat A Tookey, Caroline Sabin, UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study and the UK and Ireland National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC)

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in AIDS (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What is new in perinatal HIV prevention?Current opinion in pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frequency of Viremic Episodes in HIV-Infected Women Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy During Pregnancy: A Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Susie HuntingtonaPopulation, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health bHIV Epidemiology and Biostatistics Group, UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, London cHuman Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton dHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust eSection of Retrovirology and GU Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK fAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Mtubatuba, South Africa.
Claire Thorne
Marie-Louise Newell
Jane Anderson
Graham P Taylor
Deenan Pillay
Teresa Hill
Pat A Tookey
Caroline Sabin
UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study and the UK and Ireland National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC)

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0000199Medical Research Council G0600337Medical Research Council G0900274Medical Research Council MR/M004236/1Wellcome Trust 097410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to assess the risk of viral rebound in postpartum women on suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART).

methodsUsing data from the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) study and the UK and Ireland National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC), women with HIV-RNA 50 copies/ml or less at delivery in 2006-2011, who started life-long cART during pregnancy (n = 321) or conceived on cART (n = 618), were matched by age, duration on cART and time period, with at least one control (non-postpartum). The cumulative probability of viral rebound (HIV-RNA >200 copies/ml) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis; adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the 0-3 and 3-12 months postdelivery (cases)/pseudo-delivery (controls) were calculated in Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsIn postpartum women who conceived on cART, 5.9% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4.0-7.7] experienced viral rebound by 3 months, and 2.2% (1.4-3.0%) of their controls. The risk of viral rebound was higher in postpartum women than in controls during the first 3 months [aHR 2.63 (1.58-4.39)] but not during the 3-12 months postdelivery/pseudo-delivery. In postpartum women who started cART during pregnancy, 27% (22-32%) experienced viral rebound by 3 months, and 3.0% (1.6-4.4%) of their controls. The risk of viral rebound was higher in postpartum women than in controls during both postdelivery/pseudo-delivery periods [<3 months: aHR 6.63 (3.58-12.29); 3-12 months: aHR 4.05 (2.03-8.09)].

conclusionIn women on suppressive cART, the risk of viral rebound is increased following delivery, especially in the first 3 months, which may be related to reduced adherence, indicating the need for additional adherence support for postpartum women.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveParturitionPostpartum PeriodViral LoadAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIrelandKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPregnancyRecurrenceRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID26544700
PMCPMC4631122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.