Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26544581›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2015

Disclosure of pharmacokinetic drug results to understand nonadherence.

Ariane van der Straten, Elizabeth T Montgomery, Petina Musara, Juliane Etima, Sarita Naidoo, Nicole Laborde, Miriam Hartmann, Lisa Levy, Thola Bennie, Helen Cheng and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02358616 (An Exploratory Study of Potential Sources of Efficacy Dilution in the VOICE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02358616 completednot on this map

An Exploratory Study of Potential Sources of Efficacy Dilution in the VOICE Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorMicrobicide Trials NetworkRan2012 to 2014Enrolled219ConditionsHIV Prevention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Ariane van der StratenaWomen's Global Health Imperative (WGHI), RTI International bCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA cUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe dMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda eHIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa fFHI360, Durham, North Carolina, USA gDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa hNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS iNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland jUniversity of Washington, Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Seattle, Washington kPopulation Council, New York, New York, USA.
Elizabeth T Montgomery
Petina Musara
Juliane Etima
Sarita Naidoo
Nicole Laborde
Miriam Hartmann
Lisa Levy
Thola Bennie
Helen Cheng
Jeanna Piper
Cynthia I Grossman
Jeanne Marrazzo
Barbara Mensch
Microbicide Trials Network-003D Study Team
Family Health International 360 · USMUJHU Research Collaboration · UGNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USPopulation Council · USSan Francisco AIDS Foundation · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco · ZW

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
UZ-UCSF CTUUM1AI069436 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZVAVAHERA MIKE CHIRENJE, LYNDA STRANIX-CHIBANDA · 2012 to 2026
$75.9M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
The Johns Hopkins University - Uganda Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069530 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARY Glenn Fowler, Philippa Musoke · 2012 to 2026
$34.8M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069436NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069530NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI106707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn VOICE, a phase IIB trial of daily oral and vaginal tenofovir for HIV prevention, at least 50% of women receiving active products had undetectable tenofovir in all plasma samples tested. MTN-003D, an ancillary study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs), together with retrospective disclosure of plasma tenofovir pharmacokinetic results, explored adherence challenges during VOICE.

methodsWe systematically recruited participants with pharmacokinetic data (median six plasma samples), categorized as low (0%, N = 79), inconsistent (1-74%, N = 28) or high (≥75%; N = 20) on the basis of frequency of tenofovir detection. Following disclosure of pharmacokinetic results, reactions were captured and adherence challenges systematically elicited; IDIs and FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded and thematically analysed.

resultsWe interviewed 127 participants from South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. The most common reactions to pharmacokinetic results included surprise (41%; low pharmacokinetic), acceptance (39%; inconsistent pharmacokinetic) and happiness (65%; high pharmacokinetic). On the basis of participants' explanations, we developed a typology of adherence patterns: noninitiation, discontinuation, misimplementation (resulting from visit-driven use, variable taking, modified dosing or regimen) and adherence. Fear of product side effects/harm was a frequent concern, fuelled by stories shared among participants. Although women with high pharmacokinetic levels reported similar concerns, several described strategies to overcome challenges. Women at all pharmacokinetic levels suggested real-time drug monitoring and feedback to improve adherence and reporting.

conclusionRetrospective provision of pharmacokinetic results seemingly promoted candid discussions around nonadherence and study participation. The effect of real-time drug monitoring and feedback on adherence and accuracy of reporting should be evaluated in trials.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPlasmaRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaTenofovirUgandaYoung AdultZimbabweAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID26544581
PMCPMC4638164
OpenAlexW2120723986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.