Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26544189›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Absence of Maternal Methylation in Biparental Hydatidiform Moles from Women with NLRP7 Maternal-Effect Mutations Reveals Widespread Placenta-Specific Imprinting.

Marta Sanchez-Delgado, Alejandro Martin-Trujillo, Chiharu Tayama, Enrique Vidal, Manel Esteller, Isabel Iglesias-Platas, Nandita Deo, Olivia Barney, Ken Maclean, Kenichiro Hata and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Basis of Hydatidiform Moles-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Cancers · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Marta Sanchez-DelgadoImprinting and Cancer Group, Cancer Epigenetic and Biology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomedica de Bellvitge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Martin-TrujilloImprinting and Cancer Group, Cancer Epigenetic and Biology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomedica de Bellvitge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Chiharu TayamaDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Enrique VidalCancer Epigenetics Group, Cancer Epigenetic and Biology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomedica de Bellvitge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Manel EstellerCancer Epigenetics Group, Cancer Epigenetic and Biology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomedica de Bellvitge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel Iglesias-PlatasServicio de Neonatología, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Nandita DeoWhipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Leytonstone, London, United Kingdom.
Olivia BarneyLeicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ken MacleanPrimary Care Genetics, Sydney, Australia.
Kenichiro HataDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakabayashiDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Rosemary FisherImperial Centre for Translational and Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
David MonkImprinting and Cancer Group, Cancer Epigenetic and Biology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomedica de Bellvitge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPDuran i Reynals Hospital · ESBarts Health NHS Trust · GBHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESImperial College London · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familial recurrent hydatidiform mole (RHM) is a maternal-effect autosomal recessive disorder usually associated with mutations of the NLRP7 gene. It is characterized by HM with excessive trophoblastic proliferation, which mimics the appearance of androgenetic molar conceptuses despite their diploid biparental constitution. It has been proposed that the phenotypes of both types of mole are associated with aberrant genomic imprinting. However no systematic analyses for imprinting defects have been reported. Here, we present the genome-wide methylation profiles of both spontaneous androgenetic and biparental NLRP7 defective molar tissues. We observe total paternalization of all ubiquitous and placenta-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in four androgenetic moles; namely gain of methylation at paternally methylated loci and absence of methylation at maternally methylated regions. The methylation defects observed in five RHM biopsies from NLRP7 defective patients are restricted to lack-of-methylation at maternal DMRs. Surprisingly RHMs from two sisters with the same missense mutations, as well as consecutive RHMs from one affected female show subtle allelic methylation differences, suggesting inter-RHM variation. These epigenotypes are consistent with NLRP7 being a maternal-effect gene and involved in imprint acquisition in the oocyte. In addition, bioinformatic screening of the resulting methylation datasets identified over sixty loci with methylation profiles consistent with imprinting in the placenta, of which we confirm 22 as novel maternally methylated loci. These observations strongly suggest that the molar phenotypes are due to defective placenta-specific imprinting and over-expression of paternally expressed transcripts, highlighting that maternal-effect mutations of NLRP7 are associated with the most severe form of multi-locus imprinting defects in humans.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingMutationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAllelesFemaleHumansHydatidiform MolePlacentaPregnancyAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingNLRP7 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26544189
PMCPMC4636177
OpenAlexW2186820624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.