Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26543921›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health

Identifying Chinese Microblog Users With High Suicide Probability Using Internet-Based Profile and Linguistic Features: Classification Model.

Li Guan, Bibo Hao, Qijin Cheng, Paul Sf Yip, Tingshao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Responses to Live-Stream Suicides on Social Media.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li GuanKey Lab of Behavioral Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China ; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-9560-8435
Bibo HaoUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-8365
Qijin ChengHKJC Center for Suicide Research and Prevention The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-6223-5345
Paul Sf YipHKJC Center for Suicide Research and Prevention The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0003-1596-4120
Tingshao ZhuKey Lab of Behavioral Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China ; Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing of Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-4526

Funding

China-Rochester Suicide Research Training Program (CRSRT)D43TW009101 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CAINE, ERIC D. · 2011 to 2015
$1.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional offline assessment of suicide probability is time consuming and difficult in convincing at-risk individuals to participate. Identifying individuals with high suicide probability through online social media has an advantage in its efficiency and potential to reach out to hidden individuals, yet little research has been focused on this specific field.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to apply two classification models, Simple Logistic Regression (SLR) and Random Forest (RF), to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of identifying high suicide possibility microblog users in China through profile and linguistic features extracted from Internet-based data.

methodsThere were nine hundred and nine Chinese microblog users that completed an Internet survey, and those scoring one SD above the mean of the total Suicide Probability Scale (SPS) score, as well as one SD above the mean in each of the four subscale scores in the participant sample were labeled as high-risk individuals, respectively. Profile and linguistic features were fed into two machine learning algorithms (SLR and RF) to train the model that aims to identify high-risk individuals in general suicide probability and in its four dimensions. Models were trained and then tested by 5-fold cross validation; in which both training set and test set were generated under the stratified random sampling rule from the whole sample. There were three classic performance metrics (Precision, Recall, F1 measure) and a specifically defined metric "Screening Efficiency" that were adopted to evaluate model effectiveness.

resultsClassification performance was generally matched between SLR and RF. Given the best performance of the classification models, we were able to retrieve over 70% of the labeled high-risk individuals in overall suicide probability as well as in the four dimensions. Screening Efficiency of most models varied from 1/4 to 1/2. Precision of the models was generally below 30%.

conclusionsIndividuals in China with high suicide probability are recognizable by profile and text-based information from microblogs. Although there is still much space to improve the performance of classification models in the future, this study may shed light on preliminary screening of risky individuals via machine learning algorithms, which can work side-by-side with expert scrutiny to increase efficiency in large-scale-surveillance of suicide probability from online social media.

Indexed as

Chineseclassification modelmicroblogsuicide probability

Identifiers

PMID26543921
PMCPMC4607395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.