Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26543822›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2015

Understanding and treating hypertension in diabetic populations.

Massimo Volpe, Allegra Battistoni, Carmine Savoia, Giuliano Tocci

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Massimo Volpe1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Phycology, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 2 IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Allegra Battistoni1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Phycology, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 2 IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Carmine Savoia1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Phycology, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 2 IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Giuliano Tocci1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Phycology, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 2 IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Molecular Medicine Ireland · IESapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension and diabetes frequently occurs in the same individuals in clinical practice. Moreover, the presence of hypertension does increase the risk of new-onset diabetes, as well as diabetes does promote development of hypertension. Whatever the case, the concomitant presence of these conditions confers a high risk of major cardiovascular complications and promotes the use integrated pharmacological interventions, aimed at achieving the recommended therapeutic targets. While the benefits of lowering abnormal fasting glucose levels in patients with hypertension and diabetes have been consistently demonstrated, the blood pressure (BP) targets to be achieved to get a benefit in patients with diabetes have been recently reconsidered. In the past, randomized clinical trials have, indeed, demonstrated that lowering BP levels to less than 140/90 mmHg was associated to a substantial reduction of the risk of developing macrovascular and microvascular complications in hypertensive patients with diabetes. In addition, epidemiological and clinical reports suggested that "the lower, the better" for BP in diabetes, so that levels of BP even lower than 130/80 mmHg have been recommended. Recent randomized clinical trials, however, designed to evaluate the potential benefits obtained with an intensive antihypertensive therapy, aimed at achieving a target systolic BP level below 120 mmHg as compared to those obtained with less stringent therapy, have challenged the previous recommendations from international guidelines. In fact, detailed analyses of these trials showed a paradoxically increased risk of coronary events, mostly myocardial infarction, in those patients who achieved the lowest BP levels, particularly in the high-risk subsets of hypertensive populations with diabetes. In the light of these considerations, the present article will briefly review the common pathophysiological mechanisms, the potential sites of therapeutic interactions and the currently recommended BP targets to be achieved under pharmacological treatment in hypertension and diabetes.

Indexed as

antihypertensive treatmentblood pressure (BP) targetsdiabetes mellitusHypertensionrenin-angiotensin system (RAS)

Identifiers

PMID26543822
PMCPMC4609903
OpenAlexW2176614261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.