ArticleSpringerPlus2015
A phase I/II trial of epirubicin and docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) on 2-weekly or 3-weekly schedules: NCIC CTG MA.22.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00066443 (A Phase I/II Study Of Increasing Doses Of Epirubicin And Docetaxel Plus Pegfilgrastim For Locally Advanced Or Inflammatory Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I/II Study Of Increasing Doses Of Epirubicin And Docetaxel Plus Pegfilgrastim For Locally Advanced Or Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- High mid-treatment tumour RNA disruption in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer is associated with improved disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Trial
- Bridging molecular insights and clinical application: non-coding RNAs, targeted drug delivery, and metastatic breast cancer therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Low RNA disruption during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathologic complete response absence in patients with breast cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Behavioral, Electrophysiological, and Histological Characterization of a New Rat Model for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain: Therapeutic Potential of Duloxetine and Allopregnanolone Concomitant Treatment.Neurotoxicity research · 2020Article
- Identification of the copy number variant biomarkers for breast cancer subtypes.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Article
- Drug Combinations in Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2019Review
- Initial Fludeoxyglucose (18F) Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) Imaging of Breast Cancer - Correlations with the Primary Tumour and Locoregional Metastases.Polish journal of radiology · 2017Article
- Response.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This phase I/II neoadjuvant trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00066443) determined maximally-tolerated doses (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, response-to-therapy, and explored the role of novel response biomarkers. MA.22 accrued T3N0, any N2 or N3, and T4 breast cancer patients. Treatment was 6 cycles of 3-weekly (Schedule A; N = 47) or 8 cycles of 2-weekly (Schedule B; N = 46) epirubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy in sequential phase I/II studies, with growth factor support. In phase I of each schedule, MTDs were based on DLT. In phase II, clinical responses (CR/PR) and pathologic complete responses (pCR) were assessed. Tumor biopsy cores were obtained pre-, mid-, and post-treatment: 3 for pathologic assessment; 3 for microarray studies. DLT for Schedule A was febrile neutropenia at 105 mg/m(2) epirubicin and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel; for schedule B, it was fatigue at 75 mg/m(2) for both agents. Phase II doses were 90 mg/m(2) epirubicin/75 mg/m(2) docetaxel for Schedule A and 60 mg/m(2) (both agents) for Schedule B. Schedule A CR/PR and pCR rates were 90 and 10 %, with large reductions in tumor RNA content and integrity following treatment; Schedule B results were 93 and 0 %, with smaller reductions in RNA quality. Pre-treatment expression of several genes was associated with clinical response, including those within a likely amplicon at 17q12 (ERBB2, TCAP, GSDMB, and PNMT). The combination regimens had acceptable toxicity, good clinical response, induction of changes in tumor RNA content and integrity. Pre-treatment expression of particular genes was associated with clinical responses, including several near 17q12, which with ERBB2, may better identify chemoresponsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.