Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26543746›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Understanding drugs in breast cancer through drug sensitivity screening.

Katharina Uhr, Wendy J C Prager-van der Smissen, Anouk A J Heine, Bahar Ozturk, Marcel Smid, Hinrich W H Göhlmann, Agnes Jager, John A Foekens, John W M Martens

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Insights into gemcitabine resistance and the potential for therapeutic monitoring.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina UhrDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wendy J C Prager-van der SmissenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk A J HeineDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bahar OzturkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel SmidDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hinrich W H GöhlmannDivision of Janssen Pharmaceutica, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John A FoekensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John W M MartensDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NLJanssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With substantial numbers of breast tumors showing or acquiring treatment resistance, it is of utmost importance to develop new agents for the treatment of the disease, to know their effectiveness against breast cancer and to understand their relationships with other drugs to best assign the right drug to the right patient. To achieve this goal drug screenings on breast cancer cell lines are a promising approach. In this study a large-scale drug screening of 37 compounds was performed on a panel of 42 breast cancer cell lines representing the main breast cancer subtypes. Clustering, correlation and pathway analyses were used for data analysis. We found that compounds with a related mechanism of action had correlated IC50 values and thus grouped together when the cell lines were hierarchically clustered based on IC50 values. In total we found six clusters of drugs of which five consisted of drugs with related mode of action and one cluster with two drugs not previously connected. In total, 25 correlated and four anti-correlated drug sensitivities were revealed of which only one drug, Sirolimus, showed significantly lower IC50 values in the luminal/ERBB2 breast cancer subtype. We found expected interactions but also discovered new relationships between drugs which might have implications for cancer treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCell lineDrugsPathwayScreeningSubtype

Identifiers

PMID26543746
PMCPMC4628005
OpenAlexW2161782613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.