Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26543684›Full record

ArticleJournal of vacuum science and technology. B, Nanotechnology & microelectronics : materials, processing, measurement, & phenomena : JVST B2015

Fabrication of nanoporous membranes for tuning microbial interactions and biochemical reactions.

Peter G Shankles, Andrea C Timm, Mitchel J Doktycz, Scott T Retterer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vacuum science and technology. B, Nanotechnology & microelectronics : materials, processing, measurement, & phenomena : JVST B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter G ShanklesBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; The Center for Nanophase Material Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; and The Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee , Knoxville, Tennessee 37996.
Andrea C TimmBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831.
Mitchel J DoktyczBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; The Center for Nanophase Material Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; and The Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee , Knoxville, Tennessee 37996.
Scott T RettererBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; The Center for Nanophase Material Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; and The Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee , Knoxville, Tennessee 37996.

Funding

Culturing of the uncultured: reverse genomics and multispecies consortia in oralR01DE024463 · NIDCR · UT-BATTELLE, LLC-OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LAB · PI JOULINE, IGOR B., LEYS, EUGENE J · 2014 to 2018
$8.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New strategies for combining conventional photo- and soft-lithographic techniques with high-resolution patterning and etching strategies are needed in order to produce multiscale fluidic platforms that address the full range of functional scales seen in complex biological and chemical systems. The smallest resolution required for an application often dictates the fabrication method used. Micromachining and micropowder blasting yield higher throughput, but lack the resolution needed to fully address biological and chemical systems at the cellular and molecular scales. In contrast, techniques such as electron beam lithography or nanoimprinting allow nanoscale resolution, but are traditionally considered costly and slow. Other techniques such as photolithography or soft lithography have characteristics between these extremes. Combining these techniques to fabricate multiscale or hybrid fluidics allows fundamental biological and chemical questions to be answered. In this study, a combination of photolithography and electron beam lithography are used to produce two multiscale fluidic devices that incorporate porous membranes into complex fluidic networks in order to control the flow of energy, information, and materials in chemical form. In the first device, materials and energy were used to support chemical reactions. A nanoporous membrane fabricated with e-beam lithography separates two parallel, serpentine channels. Photolithography was used to pattern microfluidic channels around the membrane. The pores were written at 150 nm and reduced in size with silicon dioxide deposition from plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer deposition. Using this method, the molecular weight cutoff of the membrane can be adapted to the system of interest. In the second approach, photolithography was used to fabricate 200 nm thin pores. The pores confined microbes and allowed energy replenishment from a media perfusion channel. The same device can be used for study of intercellular communication via the secretion and uptake of signal molecules. Pore size was tested with 750 nm fluorescent polystyrene beads and fluorescein dye. The 200 nm polydimethylsiloxane pores were shown to be robust enough to hold 750 nm beads while under pressure, but allow fluorescein to diffuse across the barrier. Further testing showed that extended culture of bacteria within the chambers was possible. These two examples show how lithographically defined porous membranes can be adapted to two unique situations and used to tune the flow of chemical energy, materials, and information within a microfluidic network.

Identifiers

PMID26543684
PMCPMC4617741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.