ArticlePLoS currents2015
Validating the Use of Google Trends to Enhance Pertussis Surveillance in California.
Article in PLoS currents, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Application of Internet-Based Sources for Public Health Surveillance (Infoveillance): Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- Examining the Correlation of Google Influenza Trend with Hospital Data: Retrospective Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Using big data to predict pertussis infections in Jinan city, China: a time series analysis.International journal of biometeorology · 2020Article
- Tracking U.S. Pertussis Incidence: Correlation of Public Health Surveillance and Google Search Data Varies by State.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Association of sociodemographic factors and internet query data with pertussis infections in Shandong, China.Epidemiology and infection · 2019Article
- Monitoring Interest in Herpes Zoster Vaccination: Analysis of Google Search Data.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2018Article
- Vaccines Meet Big Data: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects. From the Classical 3Is ("Isolate-Inactivate-Inject") Vaccinology 1.0 to Vaccinology 3.0, Vaccinomics, and Beyond: A Historical Overview.Frontiers in public health · 2018Review
- Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Review
- Monitoring Pertussis Infections Using Internet Search Queries.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Evaluating Google Flu Trends in Latin America: Important Lessons for the Next Phase of Digital Disease Detection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
methodsPertussis has recently re-emerged in the United States. Timely surveillance is vital to estimate the burden of this disease accurately and to guide public health response. However, the surveillance of pertussis is limited by delays in reporting, consolidation and dissemination of data to relevant stakeholders. We fit and assessed a real-time predictive Google model for pertussis in California using weekly incidence data from 2009-2014. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The linear model was moderately accurate (r = 0.88). Our findings cautiously offer a complementary, real-time signal to enhance pertussis surveillance in California and help to further define the limitations and potential of Google-based epidemic prediction in the rapidly evolving field of digital disease detection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.