ArticleMateria socio-medica2015
Doctors' Preferences for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Intrauterine Insemination.
Article in Materia socio-medica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation.Journal of ovarian research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntrauterine insemination (IUI) is an important treatment for infertility. IUI combined with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is widely used because of the higher pregnancy rates compared to IUI cycles without COS. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a single center data from 458 patients underwent the first IUI cycle and had only 1 mature follicle from May 2009 to January 20144. 48 cycles were performed with Clomiphene citrate/Letrozole (CC/LE), 244 cycles with gonadotropins (Gn), 71 cycles with CC/LE+Gn, and 95 cycles in NC group.
resultsResults showed that doctors preferred Gn protocol (53.3%) (p<0.05). Older patients were more likely to be allocated to CC/LE or NC group. 98.95% patients in NC group had regular menstruation cycle, with only 49.3% in CC/LE+Gn group (p<0.05). Estradiol (E2) level was much higher in COS groups than in NC group (p<0.05, for one mature follicle patients), and no significant differences were found within the COS groups. Duration of reaching follicles maturation was the shortest in Gn group and the longest in NC group, and NC group has the smallest follicular diameter (p<0.05).
conclusionNo significances were found regarding the IUI outcomes. To sum up, doctors prefer COS for IUI. Patients' age, menstruation cycle, infertile etiology and ovary function were the main factors affecting doctors' selection of COS protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.