Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26543201›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2015

Reproducible quantitative proteotype data matrices for systems biology.

Hannes L Röst, Lars Malmström, Ruedi Aebersold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Role of Clinical Glyco(proteo)mics in Precision Medicine.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Most Alternative Isoforms Are Not Functionally Important.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannes L RöstDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Lars MalmströmDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland S3IT, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ruedi AebersoldDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Faculty of Science, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland aebersold@imsb.biol.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, many mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies have aimed at compiling an inventory of protein compounds present in a biological sample, with the long-term objective of creating a proteome map of a species. However, to answer fundamental questions about the behavior of biological systems at the protein level, accurate and unbiased quantitative data are required in addition to a list of all protein components. Fueled by advances in mass spectrometry, the proteomics field has thus recently shifted focus toward the reproducible quantification of proteins across a large number of biological samples. This provides the foundation to move away from pure enumeration of identified proteins toward quantitative matrices of many proteins measured across multiple samples. It is argued here that data matrices consisting of highly reproducible, quantitative, and unbiased proteomic measurements across a high number of conditions, referred to here as quantitative proteotype maps, will become the fundamental currency in the field and provide the starting point for downstream biological analysis. Such proteotype data matrices, for example, are generated by the measurement of large patient cohorts, time series, or multiple experimental perturbations. They are expected to have a large effect on systems biology and personalized medicine approaches that investigate the dynamic behavior of biological systems across multiple perturbations, time points, and individuals.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyComputational BiologyHumansMass SpectrometryProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID26543201
PMCPMC4710225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.