ReviewMolecular biology of the cell2015
Single-cell phenomics in budding yeast.
Review in Molecular biology of the cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary dynamics under phenotypic uncertainty.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genomic Adaptations ofMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Mapping Cell Phenomics with Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Assays.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Phenomics approaches to understand genetic networks and gene function in yeast.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022Article
- Assignment of unimodal probability distribution models for quantitative morphological phenotyping.BMC biology · 2022Article
- From Petri Plates to Petri Nets, a revolution in yeast biology.FEMS yeast research · 2022Article
- Single-cell image analysis to explore cell-to-cell heterogeneity in isogenic populations.Cell systems · 2021Review
- Systematic genetics and single-cell imaging reveal widespread morphological pleiotropy and cell-to-cell variability.Molecular systems biology · 2020Article
- From observing to predicting single-cell structure and function with high-throughput/high-content microscopy.Essays in biochemistry · 2019Review
- The budding yeast RSC complex maintains ploidy by promoting spindle pole body insertion.The Journal of cell biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Global study of holistic morphological effectors in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Testing the neutral hypothesis of phenotypic evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Phenotypic Diagnosis of Lineage and Differentiation During Sake Yeast Breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Exploiting Single-Cell Quantitative Data to Map Genetic Variants Having Probabilistic Effects.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Large-Scale Survey of Intraspecific Fitness and Cell Morphology Variation in a Protoploid Yeast Species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The demand for phenomics, a high-dimensional and high-throughput phenotyping method, has been increasing in many fields of biology. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a unicellular model organism, provides an invaluable system for dissecting complex cellular processes using high-resolution phenotyping. Moreover, the addition of spatial and temporal attributes to subcellular structures based on microscopic images has rendered this cell phenotyping system more reliable and amenable to analysis. A well-designed experiment followed by appropriate multivariate analysis can yield a wealth of biological knowledge. Here we review recent advances in cell imaging and illustrate their broad applicability to eukaryotic cells by showing how these techniques have advanced our understanding of budding yeast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.