Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26542991›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2016

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2015. Part 1 of 2: Plaque imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Wael A AlJaroudi, Fadi G Hage

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: Quo Vadis?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wael A AlJaroudiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging, Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fadi G HageDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 314, 1720 2nd AVE S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. fadihage@uab.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015, many original articles pertaining to cardiovascular imaging with impressive quality were published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. In a set of 2 articles, we provide an overview of these contributions to facilitate for the interested reader a quick review of the advancements that occurred in the field over this year. In this first article, we focus on arterial plaque imaging, cardiac positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPeriodicals as TopicPlaque, AtheroscleroticPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticalscomputed tomography (CT)fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)magnetic resonance imagingmyocardial perfusion imaging: PETVulnerable atherosclerotic plaque

Identifiers

PMID26542991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.