Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26542978›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2016

Differential regulation by AMP and ADP of AMPK complexes containing different γ subunit isoforms.

Fiona A Ross, Thomas E Jensen, D Grahame Hardie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. RNA therapeutics: current status and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Spatial regulation of AMPK activity under oxidative stress requires LKB1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Research Progress of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona A RossDivision of Cell Signalling & Immunology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, U.K.
Thomas E JensenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
D Grahame HardieDivision of Cell Signalling & Immunology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, U.K. d.g.hardie@dundee.ac.uk.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The γ subunits of heterotrimeric AMPK complexes contain the binding sites for the regulatory adenine nucleotides AMP, ADP and ATP. We addressed whether complexes containing different γ isoforms display different responses to adenine nucleotides by generating cells stably expressing FLAG-tagged versions of the γ1, γ2 or γ3 isoform. When assayed at a physiological ATP concentration (5 mM), γ1- and γ2-containing complexes were allosterically activated almost 10-fold by AMP, with EC50 values one to two orders of magnitude lower than the ATP concentration. By contrast, γ3 complexes were barely activated by AMP under these conditions, although we did observe some activation at lower ATP concentrations. Despite this, all three complexes were activated, due to increased Thr(172) phosphorylation, when cells were incubated with mitochondrial inhibitors that increase cellular AMP. With γ1 complexes, activation and Thr(172) phosphorylation induced by the upstream kinase LKB1 [liver kinase B1; but not calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase (CaMKKβ)] in cell-free assays was markedly promoted by AMP and, to a smaller extent and less potently, by ADP. However, effects of AMP or ADP on activation and phosphorylation of the γ2 and γ3 complexes were small or insignificant. Binding of AMP or ADP protected all three γ subunit complexes against inactivation by Thr(172) dephosphorylation; with γ2 complexes, ADP had similar potency to AMP, but with γ1 and γ3 complexes, ADP was less potent than AMP. Thus, AMPK complexes containing different γ subunit isoforms respond differently to changes in AMP, ADP or ATP. These differences may tune the responses of the isoforms to fit their differing physiological roles.

Indexed as

Adenosine DiphosphateAdenosine MonophosphateAMP-Activated Protein KinasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHEK293 CellsHumansProtein IsoformsProtein SubunitsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine MonophosphateAMP-Activated Protein KinasesPRKAG1 protein, humanPRKAG2 protein, humanPRKAG3 protein, humanProtein IsoformsProtein Subunitsadenine nucleotidesadenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP)adenosine 5′-phosphate (AMP)adenosine 5′-phosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK)adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP)

Identifiers

PMID26542978
PMCPMC4700476
OpenAlexW2103851013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.