Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26542785›Full record

ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2015

Clinical implications of proliferation activity in T1 or T2 male gastric cancer patients.

Young-Woo Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Han-Seong Kim, Mi-Kyung Kim, Hai-Li Hwang, Vishal Chandra, Shiv Poojan, Yura Song, Jae-Soo Koh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Young-Woo KimResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Bang Wool EomResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Myeong-Cherl KookResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Han-Seong KimDepartment of Pathology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Mi-Kyung KimResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hai-Li HwangResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Vishal ChandraResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Shiv PoojanResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Yura SongResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-9172
Jae-Soo KohDepartment of Pathology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Chang-Dae BaeDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, and Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Suwon, Korea.
Jungsil RoResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kyeong-Man HongResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proliferation activity has already been established as a prognostic marker or as a marker for anticancer drug sensitivity. In gastric cancer, however, the prognostic significance of proliferation activity is still being debated. Several studies evaluating proliferation activity using Ki-67 have shown controversial results in terms of the relationship between proliferation activity and overall survival (OS) or drug sensitivity in gastric cancer patients. Because cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 (CKAP2) staining has recently been introduced as a marker of proliferation activity, we analyzed 437 gastric cancer tissues through CKAP2 immunohistochemistry, and we evaluated the chromatin CKAP2-positive cell count (CPCC) for proliferation activity. Although the CPCC did not show any significant correlation with OS in the male, female or total number of cases, it did show a significant correlation in the T1 or T2 male patient subgroup, according to log-rank tests (P=0.001) and univariate analysis (P=0.045). Additionally, multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard regression model showed a significant correlation between the CPCC and OS (P=0.039) for the co-variables of age, gender, T stage, N stage, histology, tumor location, tumor size and adjuvant chemotherapy. In male gastric cancer cell lines, faster-growing cancer cells showed higher sensitivity to cisplatin than slow-growing cells. Thus our study indicates that CPCC-measured proliferation activity demonstrates a significantly worse prognosis in T1 or T2 male gastric cancer patients. The CPCC will help to more precisely classify gastric cancer patients and to select excellent candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, which in turn will facilitate further clinical chemotherapeutic trials.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationCisplatinCytoskeletal ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsStomachStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinCKAP2 protein, humanCytoskeletal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26542785
PMCPMC4673469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.