ArticleScientific reports2015
A high risk of osteosarcoma in individuals who are homozygous for the p.D104N in endostatin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The D104N polymorphism (p.D104N) in endostatin has been previously identified in many types of cancer, and this polymorphism is believed to be a phenotypic modulator in some tumors. However, it is unknown whether endostatin p.D104N affects the risk and progression of osteosarcoma (OS). Here, we analyzed the p.D104N endostatin variant in 236 patients with OS and 418 healthy individuals. Similar frequencies of wild type and heterozygous p.104DN endostatin were observed in controls and OS patients. Interestingly, the frequency of the homozygous p.D104N (p.104NN) genotype was higher in OS patients group compared to control group, suggesting that individuals with p.104NN endostatin have a significantly increased risk for OS. In addition, OS patients with p.104NN endostatin had a shorter survival time and a higher rate of metastasis than OS patients with wild type endostatin. Animal experiments revealed that overexpression of p.104NN endostatin did not significantly inhibit OS lung metastasis. Interestingly, administration of endostatin dramatically inhibited OS lung metastasis in the p.104NN endostatin xenograft model. Together, these results suggest that p.104NN of endostatin is associated with the risk of OS and demonstrates predictive significance for clinical outcome in OS patients. In addition, endostatin therapy may be necessary for OS patients harboring p.104NN endostatin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.