SynthesisCurrent microbiology2016
A Meta-analysis of Bacterial Diversity in the Feces of Cattle.
Synthesis in Current microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergent residual feed intake is associated with distinct fecal microbiota in early fattening Hanwoo steers.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026Article
- Effect of divergent residual feed intake on the fecal microbiota in fattening Hanwoo steers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of By-Products from Pistachio Skin on Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Healthy Lambs as Sustainable Feeding Ingredient.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Characterization of bacterial communities of ewe's vaginal tract and its potential impact on reproductive efficiency.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Longitudinal assessment of the prevalence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Sex-Induced Changes in Microbial Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes in Gastrointestinal Tract of Simmental Cattle.Biology · 2024Article
- Uncovering newMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Exploring the Impact of Ampelopsis Grossedentata Flavonoids on Growth Performance, Ruminal Microbiota, and Plasma Physiology and Biochemistry of Kids.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Scientific characterization methods for better utilization of cattle dung and urine: a concise review.Tropical animal health and production · 2023Review
- Comparison of Fecal Microbiota Communities between Primiparous and Multiparous Cows during Non-Pregnancy and Pregnancy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- - Invited Review - Assessment of the gastrointestinal microbiota using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing in ruminant nutrition.Animal bioscience · 2023Article
- Bovine neonatal microbiome origins: a review of proposed microbial community presence from conception to colostrum.Translational animal science · 2023Article
- The impact of different diets and genders on fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle.Journal of animal science and technology · 2022Article
- Possibility of Using By-Products with High NDF Content to Alter the Fecal Short Chain Fatty Acid Profiles, Bacterial Community, and Digestibility of Lactating Dairy Cows.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Fecal Microbiome Features Associated with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Carriage in Dairy Heifers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Soil Aggregation Shaped the Distribution and Interaction of Bacterial-Fungal Community Based on a 38-Year Fertilization Experiment in China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Effects of whole maize high-grain diet feeding on colonic fermentation and bacterial community in weaned lambs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Gut microbiota and meat quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Bioprospecting of cowdung microflora for sustainable agricultural, biotechnological and environmental applications.Current research in microbial sciences · 2021Review
- Composition of Fecal Microbiota in Grazing and Feedlot Angus Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis on 16S rRNA gene sequences of bovine fecal origin that are publicly available in the RDP database. A total of 13,663 sequences including 603 isolate sequences were identified in the RDP database (Release 11, Update 1), where 13,447 sequences were assigned to 10 phyla, 17 classes, 28 orders, 59 families, and 110 genera, while the remaining 216 sequences could not be assigned to a known phylum. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the first and the second predominant phyla, respectively. About 41 % of the total sequences could not be assigned to a known genus. The total sequences were assigned to 1252 OTUs at 97 % sequence similarity. A small number of OTUs shared among datasets indicate that fecal bacterial communities of cattle are greatly affected by various factors, specifically diet. This study may guide future studies to further analyze fecal bacterial communities of cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26542532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.