ArticleThe Laryngoscope2016
What is a clinically relevant difference in MDADI scores between groups of head and neck cancer patients?
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in head and neck cancer patients with radiation induced dysphagia-a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Pooled it
- A Phase 2 Exploratory Trial Evaluating Computed Tomography-Based Midtreatment Nodal Response to Select for De-escalated Chemoradiation Therapy in the Definitive Management of p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Trial
- Trial
- A randomized controlled study evaluating the head-lift exercise in head and neck cancer patients with radiation-induced dysphagia: effect on swallowing function and health-related quality of life over 12 months.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Long-Term, Prospective Performance of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory in "Low-Intermediate Risk" Oropharyngeal Carcinoma After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2017Trial
- Article
- MDASI-HN Symptom Profiling for Early-Risk Stratification of Hypoglossal Neuropathy in Survivors of Oropharyngeal Cancer.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Article
- CT-Defined Low Skeletal Muscle Mass Predicts Early Swallowing and Quality-of-Life Recovery After Head-and-Neck Oncologic Reconstruction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgically Based Deintensification for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Personalized swallowing rehabilitation program for post-surgical dysphagia in oral cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of HPV+ Oropharyngeal Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Following Transoral Robotic Surgery.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Volunteers with and without a history of head and neck cancer swallowing, saliva, and QOL in head/neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Observational
- Progress Toward Estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Intelligibility: A Crowdsourced Perceptual Experiment.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Minimal Detectable Change of Experienced and Novice Listeners' Ratings of Overall Severity of Voice Quality in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Transoral Robotic Surgery in Chronic Lingual Tonsillitis: An Observational Cohort Study.Head & neck · 2025Observational
- Review
- Validation of the Finnish MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objective/hypothesisTo describe clinically relevant between-group differences in MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. STUDY
designRetrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 1,136 HNC patients seen for modified barium swallow (MBS) studies.
methodsThe MDADI was administered by written questionnaire at the MBS appointment. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory global, composite, and subscale scores were calculated. Anchor-based methods were employed to determine clinically meaningful between-group differences by feeding tube status, aspiration status (per MBS study), and diet level.
resultsMean MDADI scores for the 1,136 patients were: emotional 65.8 ± 17.3, functional 68.1 ± 19.6, physical 60.1 ± 18.6, global 59.3 ± 28.3, and composite 64.0 ± 17.1. Three hundred seventy-eight patients (33%) were feeding tube-dependent; 395 (34.8%) were aspirators; 122 (11%) were nothing per oral (Performance Status Scale-Head and Neck [PSS-HN] diet = 0); and 249 (22%) ate unrestricted, regular diets (PSS-HN diet = 100). Statistically significant (P < 0.0001) between-group differences (feeding tube vs. no feeding tube, aspirator vs. nonaspirator, oral vs. nonoral diet, PSS-HN diet levels) were observed for all mean MDADI scores (global, composite, and subscales). A mean difference of 10 points in composite MDADI scores differentiated feeding tube-dependent from nontube-dependent patients, aspirators from nonaspirators, and distinct PSS-HN diet levels.
conclusionsWe identify that a 10-point between-group difference in composite MDADI scores was associated with clinically meaningful between-group differences in swallowing function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:1108-1113, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.