ArticleAmerican heart journal2015
Psychosocial characteristics and outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist device implanted as destination therapy.
Article in American heart journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socio-economic position, multimorbidity, and health care utilization among Danish left ventricular assist device patients.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Depression among Patients with an Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Device: Uncovering Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Implications for Patient Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Commentary: How to predict a harmonious relationship between patients and their left ventricular assist device?The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in Recovery and Device Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- The good, the bad, the ugly: Optimal left ventricular assist device duration in bridge to transplantation.JTCVS open · 2021Article
- Mental health disorders and emergency resource use and outcomes in ventricular assist device supported patients.American heart journal · 2021Article
- The impact of socioeconomic status in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021Article
- Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.Circulation. Heart failure · 2020Article
- Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.Cureus · 2020Review
- Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing).Circulation. Heart failure · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychosocial factors impact survival in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation, but it is unclear whether they affect outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as destination therapy (DT).
methodsPatients undergoing DT LVAD at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, from February 2007 to December 2013 were included. Psychosocial characteristics at the time of LVAD implantation were abstracted from the medical record. Andersen-Gill and Cox models were used to examine the association between psychosocial characteristics and all-cause readmission and death, respectively. Patients were censored at death or last follow-up through September 2014.
resultsAmong 136 patients (mean age. 64 years; 17% female), most were married/living with a partner (82%), half (55%) had post-high school education, and a history of depression was common (32%). Although most patients were former tobacco users (60%) only a small proportion were current tobacco users (10%) and had a history of alcohol abuse (16%) or illegal drug use (7%). After a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 1.8 years, 78% of patients had been readmitted (range, 0-14 per person) and 49% had died. There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of death according to psychosocial characteristics. However, current tobacco users had lower risk of readmission (adjusted HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88), while illegal drug use (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.01-2.35) and depression (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.40-2.22) were associated with higher readmission risk.
conclusionsPsychosocial characteristics are not significant predictors of death but are associated with readmission risk after DT LVAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.