Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26542467›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2015

Measuring the positive psychological well-being of people with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional validation of the subjective vitality scale.

Peter C Rouse, Jet J J C S Veldhuijzen Van Zanten, Nikos Ntoumanis, George S Metsios, Chen-an Yu, George D Kitas, Joan L Duda

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vitality Revisited: The Evolving Concept of Flourishing and Its Relevance to Personal and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Subjective Vitality Scale: evidence from Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter C RouseDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. p.c.rouse@bath.ac.uk.
Jet J J C S Veldhuijzen Van ZantenSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. j.j.veldhuijzenvanzant@bham.ac.uk.
Nikos NtoumanisHealth Psychology & Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychology & Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia. nikos.ntoumanis@curtin.edu.au.
George S MetsiosDepartment of Rheumatology, Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK. G.Metsios@wlv.ac.uk.
Chen-an YuSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. CXY094@bham.ac.uk.
George D KitasSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. kitas@dgh.nhs.uk.
Joan L DudaSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. J.L.duda@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently suffer from compromised physical and psychological health, however, little is known about positive indicators of health, due to a lack of validated outcome measures. This study aims to validate a clinically relevant outcome measure of positive psychological well-being for people with RA. The first study examined the reliability and factorial validity of the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS), whilst study 2 tested the instruments convergent validity.

methodsIn study 1, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society members (N = 333; M age = 59.82 years SD = 11.00) completed a postal questionnaire. For study 2, participants (N = 106; M age = 56 years, SD = 12 years) were those recruited to a randomized control trial comparing two physical activity interventions who completed a range of health-related questionnaires.

resultsThe SVS had a high level of internal consistency (α = .93, Rho = .92). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the uni-dimensional factor structure of the questionnaire among RA patients [χ = 1327 (10), CFI = 1.0, SRMSR = .01 and RMSEA = .00 (.00 - .08)]. Support for the scales convergent validity was revealed by significant (p < .05) relationships, in expected directions, with health related quality of life (r = .59), physical function (r = .58), feelings of fatigue (r = -.70), anxiety (r = -.57) and depression (r = -.73).

conclusionsResults from two studies have provided support for the internal consistency, factorial structure and convergent validity of the Subjective Vitality Scale. Researchers and healthcare providers may employ this clinically relevant, freely available and brief assessment with the confidence that it is a valid and reliable measure of positive psychological well-being for RA patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN04121489 . Registered 5 September 2012.

Indexed as

Psychological TestsAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26542467
PMCPMC4635963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.