ReviewDer Orthopade2015
[Orthopaedic implant-associated infections: Update of antimicrobial therapy].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection - outcomes following algorithm-guided treatment at a multidisciplinary referral centre.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Care of Patients With Bone and Joint Infections Through Educational Interventions.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- [Plastic and reconstruction surgery for non-healing wound after posterior spinal surgery].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
- Enzyme-Responsive Nanoparticles and Coatings Made from Alginate/Peptide Ciprofloxacin Conjugates as Drug Release System.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Conversion From Knee Arthrodesis Back to Arthroplasty: A Particular Challenge in Combination With Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Arthroplasty today · 2020Article
- Dalbavancin for treatment of implant-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in an experimental rat model.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- [Management of periprosthetic infections of the knee].Der Orthopade · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In infections related to prosthetic joints and internal fixation devices, microorganisms adhere as biofim on the surface of the implant. Biofilms are not only resistant to phagocytosis, but also to most antimicrobial agents. Therefore, spontaneous cure does never occur, and antibiotics have to be given for several months. According to traditional concepts, removal of all foreign material was considered as prerequisite for cure. Yet, during the last decades, it has been shown that staphylococcal biofilms can be eliminated by rifampin combination therapy, and Gram-negative biofilms by fluoroquinolones. However, reliable biofilm elimination is only possible, if the duration of infection does not exceed 3-4 weeks. Correct total duration of the antimicrobial therapy has never been tested in a controlled trial. Currently, treatment duration is 3 (hip prosthesis) and 6 (knee prosthesis) months in patients undergoing débridement with implant retention, one-stage exchange, and two-stage exchange with a short interval of 2-3 weeks. According to a recent observational trial, a treatment duration of 2 and 3 months, respectively, is equivalent to the longer duration in patients undergoing débridement and implant retention. The optimal surgical therapy should be chosen according to a rational algorithm. It is crucial choosing the optimal surgical intervention from the beginning, because the final functional success depends on the cure by the first attempt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26542407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.