ArticleBMC medical research methodology2015
A re-randomisation design for clinical trials.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- SWIM (sickle with ibuprofen and morphine) randomised controlled trial fails to recruit: lessons learnt.BMJ open · 2016Trial
- An online sample size calculator for designing partially clustered trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Article
- High flow oxygen for vaso-occlusive crisis: a multicentre, prospective, randomised, multi-arm, multi-stage clinical trial (OSONE).BMJ open · 2025Article
- Sample Size Calculations for Partially Clustered Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Low-volume combined aerobic and resistance high-intensity interval training in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Partially clustered designs for clinical trials: Unifying existing designs using consistent terminology.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Review
- Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Nonmyopic and pseudo-nonmyopic approaches to optimal sequential design in the presence of covariates.Journal of statistical computation and simulation · 2023Article
- Re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: Estimands and independence estimators.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Article
- Designing Multi-arm Multistage Adaptive Trials for Neuroprotection in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology · 2022Article
- Independence estimators for re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: a simulation study.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Personalised randomised controlled trial designs-a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2021Review
- Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments.Reproduction & fertility · 2021Review
- Article
- ATTIRE: Albumin To prevenT Infection in chronic liveR failurE: study protocol for an interventional randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Re-randomization increased recruitment and provided similar treatment estimates as parallel designs in trials of febrile neutropenia.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecruitment to clinical trials is often problematic, with many trials failing to recruit to their target sample size. As a result, patient care may be based on suboptimal evidence from underpowered trials or non-randomised studies.
methodsFor many conditions patients will require treatment on several occasions, for example, to treat symptoms of an underlying chronic condition (such as migraines, where treatment is required each time a new episode occurs), or until they achieve treatment success (such as fertility, where patients undergo treatment on multiple occasions until they become pregnant). We describe a re-randomisation design for these scenarios, which allows each patient to be independently randomised on multiple occasions. We discuss the circumstances in which this design can be used.
resultsThe re-randomisation design will give asymptotically unbiased estimates of treatment effect and correct type I error rates under the following conditions: (a) patients are only re-randomised after the follow-up period from their previous randomisation is complete; (b) randomisations for the same patient are performed independently; and (c) the treatment effect is constant across all randomisations. Provided the analysis accounts for correlation between observations from the same patient, this design will typically have higher power than a parallel group trial with an equivalent number of observations.
conclusionsIf used appropriately, the re-randomisation design can increase the recruitment rate for clinical trials while still providing an unbiased estimate of treatment effect and correct type I error rates. In many situations, it can increase the power compared to a parallel group design with an equivalent number of observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.