Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541668›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Point-of-care screening for syphilis and HIV in the borderlands: challenges in implementation in the Brazilian Amazon.

Carole Zen Ruffinen, Meritxell Sabidó, Ximena Pamela Díaz-Bermúdez, Marcus Lacerda, David Mabey, Rosanna W Peeling, Adele Schwartz Benzaken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. HIV, syphilis, and viral hepatitis among Latin American indigenous peoples and Afro-descendants: a systematic review.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Carole Zen RuffinenSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. carole.zenruffinen@gmail.com.
Meritxell SabidóFundação de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado (FMT-HVD), Avenida Pedro Teixeira 25, CEP: 69040-000, Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil. xellsabido@gmail.com.
Ximena Pamela Díaz-BermúdezDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. ximenapam@gmail.com.
Marcus LacerdaFundação de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado (FMT-HVD), Avenida Pedro Teixeira 25, CEP: 69040-000, Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil. marcuslacerda.br@gmail.com.
David MabeyDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. David.Mabey@lshtm.ac.uk.
Rosanna W PeelingDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Rosanna.Peeling@lshtm.ac.uk.
Adele Schwartz BenzakenDepartamento de DST/Aids, Fundação Alfredo da Mata, Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil. adelebenz@gmail.com.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBDepartment of STD, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis · BRFundação de Medicina Tropical · BRSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversitat de Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care (POC) screening for HIV and syphilis using rapid testing was implemented in indigenous communities in the triple-border area of the Brazilian Amazon. We describe the context of the early introduction of POC screening, explore hindering and enabling factors for POC implementation, and recommend strategies for feasible, viable, and sustainable syphilis and HIV screening interventions.

methodsThis was a qualitative study based on grounded theory methodology. Data were collected using in-depth interviews, semi-structured questionnaires, and field observations and were analysed using the framework approach. Qualitative information was complemented by quantitative data for descriptive purposes.

resultsAn overall high score for vulnerability to acquiring HIV and syphilis was observed among the indigenous communities. Health professionals reported satisfactory rapid testing acceptance, although concerns were raised about the pain of the fingerprick. Counselling-related challenges included ensuring the accuracy of translations, collaborating with translators and communicating positive test results. Over 3 months, 86.7% of the syphilis-positive individuals began treatment, and all of them notified their partners. Accessibility, measured as travel time via the local transportation network, was a barrier to health care access. A lack of gasoline for boats and other transportation was also a hindering factor at all levels of implementation.

conclusionsThe recommendations address the preparation phase at the coordination level as well as at the training level. Tools such as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analyses; checklists; context-adapted protocols; and fact sheets are very simple methods to facilitate implementation. The findings of this study are important because they may inform the implementation of new health technologies in low-resource national disease control programmes in remote communities.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousPoint-of-Care TestingBrazilCounselingFemaleGrounded TheoryHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningPopulation GroupsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, Infectious

Identifiers

PMID26541668
PMCPMC4635608
OpenAlexW2142385046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.