Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541581›Full record

ReviewBrain research2016

Auditory short-term memory in the primate auditory cortex.

Brian H Scott, Mortimer Mishkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Auditory cortical connectivity in humans.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Correlates of Auditory Decision-Making in Prefrontal, Auditory, and Basal Lateral Amygdala Cortical Areas.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Towards a new taxonomy of primate vocal production learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neurocomputational Consequences of Evolutionary Connectivity Changes in Perisylvian Language Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian H ScottLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: brianscott@mail.nih.gov.
Mortimer MishkinLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: mishkinm@mail.nih.gov.
National Institute of Mental Health · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Memory in AuditionZIAMH001101 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MISHKIN, MORTIMER · 2009 to 2017
$10.1M
CORTICAL MECHANISMS OF AUDITORY PROCESSING IN CATS AND PRIMATESZ01MH001101 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MISHKIN, MORTIMER · 1992 to 2008
$2.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH001101Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sounds are fleeting, and assembling the sequence of inputs at the ear into a coherent percept requires auditory memory across various time scales. Auditory short-term memory comprises at least two components: an active ׳working memory' bolstered by rehearsal, and a sensory trace that may be passively retained. Working memory relies on representations recalled from long-term memory, and their rehearsal may require phonological mechanisms unique to humans. The sensory component, passive short-term memory (pSTM), is tractable to study in nonhuman primates, whose brain architecture and behavioral repertoire are comparable to our own. This review discusses recent advances in the behavioral and neurophysiological study of auditory memory with a focus on single-unit recordings from macaque monkeys performing delayed-match-to-sample (DMS) tasks. Monkeys appear to employ pSTM to solve these tasks, as evidenced by the impact of interfering stimuli on memory performance. In several regards, pSTM in monkeys resembles pitch memory in humans, and may engage similar neural mechanisms. Neural correlates of DMS performance have been observed throughout the auditory and prefrontal cortex, defining a network of areas supporting auditory STM with parallels to that supporting visual STM. These correlates include persistent neural firing, or a suppression of firing, during the delay period of the memory task, as well as suppression or (less commonly) enhancement of sensory responses when a sound is repeated as a ׳match' stimulus. Auditory STM is supported by a distributed temporo-frontal network in which sensitivity to stimulus history is an intrinsic feature of auditory processing. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Auditory working memory.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionHumansMemory, Short-TermPrimatesCortexHearingMacaqueShort-term memoryWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID26541581
PMCPMC4853305
OpenAlexW2147458679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.