ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017
Teaching of Independent Exercises for Prehabilitation in Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of exercise based prehabilitation on postoperative pain in breast cancer patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Pooled it
- Rationales for Prehabilitation Programs in Patients Preparing for Oncologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Physical prehabilitation in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of preoperative personal education on shoulder function and lymphedema in patients with breast cancer: A consort.Medicine · 2022Trial
- Effect of physical activity levels on oncological breast surgery recovery: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- An assessment of study characteristics, quality and reporting in cancer prehabilitation literature: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Preoperative decreased physical activity is associated with greater postoperative pain: the mediating role of preoperative sleep disturbance.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Conservative interventions and clinical outcome measures used in the perioperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy: a scoping review.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- State of Rehabilitation Research in the Head and Neck Cancer Population: Functional Impact vs. Impairment-Focused Outcomes.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Resistance Exercise for Breast Cancer Patients? Evidence from the Last Decade.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Prehabilitation is the Gateway to Better Functional Outcomes for Individuals with Cancer.Journal of cancer rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Feasibility of Prehabilitation Prior to Breast Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Compliance and safety of a novel home exercise program for patients with high-grade brain tumors, a prospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We attempted to determine the feasibility of studying prehabilitation exercises to improve shoulder pain and abduction range of motion (ROM) after breast cancer surgery. We evaluated methods of exercise teaching and assessed effect on postsurgical seroma formation. This was a feasibility study with two non-blinded groups of subjects randomized by timing of appointment. This single-site study was performed at an academic tertiary medical center. Sixty cancer patients were randomly assigned to either group 1, in-person teaching arm, n = 36, or group 2, video-only teaching arm, n = 24. Forty-five patients completed the study. Shoulder exercises were assigned to both groups 1 month prior to surgery during evaluation. Group 1 received in-person instruction on exercises, plus an information sheet with exercises and a link to an online video. Group 2 received only the information sheet with exercises and a link to the online video. The primary outcomes considered are as follows: exercise compliance, shoulder pain (via visual analog scale), shoulder abduction ROM (via goniometer), and presence or absence of seroma. Seventy-six percent of study patients chose to exercise. There was no difference in exercise compliance between in-person teaching versus video teaching (75 %, 24/32 vs. 77 %, 10/13, OR = 1.03). Sixty-six of patients (20/30) lost greater than 10° shoulder abduction ROM at 1 month post surgery. Twenty-nine of patients (9/31) had worse shoulder pain than baseline at 1 month post surgery (24 %, 6/25 exercisers, and 50 %, 3/6 non-exercisers). Fifteen percent of patients (4/27) had worse shoulder pain than baseline at 3 months post surgery (8 %, 2/23 exercisers, and 100 %, 2/2 non-exercisers). Prehabilitation exercise program inferred no additional risk of seroma formation (Exercisers 21 %, 7/33 vs. non-exercisers 22 %, 2/9, OR = 0.94). Our subjects were able to perform three exercises independently in the preoperative period. A high-quality randomized controlled trial is necessary to assess the appropriate timing and efficacy of this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26541465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.