ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015
Acquisition, Analysis, and Sharing of Data in 2015 and Beyond: A Survey of the Landscape: A Conference Report From the American Heart Association Data Summit 2015.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms.BMC medical ethics · 2019Pooled it
- Melatonin biosynthesis and regulation in reproduction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Insights from ARCOS-V's Transition to Remote Data Collection during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Study.Neuroepidemiology · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing healthcare and medicine: The impact of modern technologies for a healthier future-A comprehensive review.Health care science · 2024Review
- Research on aerobic fitness in children and adolescents: a bibliometric analysis based on the 100 most-cited articles.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Online Health Communities: an alternative feasible data registry tool for developing countries.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: a narrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Review
- Non-Invasive Data Acquisition and IoT Solution for Human Vital Signs Monitoring: Applications, Limitations and Future Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- The Longitudinal Epidemiologic Assessment of Diabetes Risk (LEADR): Unique 1.4 M patient Electronic Health Record cohort.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Informed consent within a learning health system: A scoping review.Learning health systems · 2020Article
- Creation of a Multicenter Pediatric Inpatient Data Repository Derived from Electronic Health Records.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Sharing individual participant data from clinical studies: a cross-sectional online survey among Italian patient and citizen groups.BMJ open · 2019Article
- STEPS-T Program Improves Endovascular Treatment Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke; A 6-Year Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Biobanks in the Era of Digital Medicine.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2018Article
- Endovascular treatment outcomes using the Stroke Triage Education, Procedure Standardization, and Technology (STEPS-T) program.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018Article
- Clinical Research Informatics: Supporting the Research Study Lifecycle.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Priorities for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Centers for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Working Group.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2017Article
- Precision medicine in cardiology.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2016Review
- To share or not to share, the dilemma is going to be solved.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA 1.5-day interactive forum was convened to discuss critical issues in the acquisition, analysis, and sharing of data in the field of cardiovascular and stroke science. The discussion will serve as the foundation for the American Heart Association's (AHA's) near-term and future strategies in the Big Data area. The concepts evolving from this forum may also inform other fields of medicine and science. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 47 participants representing stakeholders from 7 domains (patients, basic scientists, clinical investigators, population researchers, clinicians and healthcare system administrators, industry, and regulatory authorities) participated in the conference. Presentation topics included updates on data as viewed from conventional medical and nonmedical sources, building and using Big Data repositories, articulation of the goals of data sharing, and principles of responsible data sharing. Facilitated breakout sessions were conducted to examine what each of the 7 stakeholder domains wants from Big Data under ideal circumstances and the possible roles that the AHA might play in meeting their needs. Important areas that are high priorities for further study regarding Big Data include a description of the methodology of how to acquire and analyze findings, validation of the veracity of discoveries from such research, and integration into investigative and clinical care aspects of future cardiovascular and stroke medicine. Potential roles that the AHA might consider include facilitating a standards discussion (eg, tools, methodology, and appropriate data use), providing education (eg, healthcare providers, patients, investigators), and helping build an interoperable digital ecosystem in cardiovascular and stroke science.
conclusionThere was a consensus across stakeholder domains that Big Data holds great promise for revolutionizing the way cardiovascular and stroke research is conducted and clinical care is delivered; however, there is a clear need for the creation of a vision of how to use it to achieve the desired goals. Potential roles for the AHA center around facilitating a discussion of standards, providing education, and helping establish a cardiovascular digital ecosystem. This ecosystem should be interoperable and needs to interface with the rapidly growing digital object environment of the modern-day healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.