Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541391›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015

Acquisition, Analysis, and Sharing of Data in 2015 and Beyond: A Survey of the Landscape: A Conference Report From the American Heart Association Data Summit 2015.

Elliott M Antman, Emelia J Benjamin, Robert A Harrington, Steven R Houser, Eric D Peterson, Mary Ann Bauman, Nancy Brown, Vincent Bufalino, Robert M Califf, Mark A Creager and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biobanks in the Era of Digital Medicine.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  16. Endovascular treatment outcomes using the Stroke Triage Education, Procedure Standardization, and Technology (STEPS-T) program.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Precision medicine in cardiology.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Elliott M Antman
Emelia J Benjamin
Robert A Harrington
Steven R Houser
Eric D Peterson
Mary Ann Bauman
Nancy Brown
Vincent Bufalino
Robert M Califf
Mark A Creager
Alan Daugherty
David L Demets
Bernard P Dennis
Shahram Ebadollahi
Mariell Jessup
Michael S Lauer
Bernard Lo
Calum A MacRae
Michael V McConnell
Alexa T McCray
Michelle M Mello
Eric Mueller
Jane W Newburger
Sally Okun
Milton Packer
Anthony Philippakis
Peipei Ping
Prad Prasoon
Véronique L Roger
Steve Singer
Robert Temple
Melanie B Turner
Kevin Vigilante
John Warner
Patrick Wayte
American Heart Association Data Sharing Summit Attendees
Bernard (Czechia) · CZHarrington College of Design · USInvision Sally Jobe · USPeterson (Norway) · NOSinger (United States) · USSt Bernard's Hospital · GISteven Winter Associates (United States) · USTemple College · USThe Jane Goodall Institute · USTurner Consulting Group (United States) · USWarner University · USWilliam Jessup University · USXi'an Peihua University · CN

Funding

Developing i2b2 into a Health Innovation Platform for Clinical Decision Support in the Genomics EraR01HG009174 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARONSON, SAMUEL JEFFREY, MACRAE, CALUM A. · 2016 to 2019
$2.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA 1.5-day interactive forum was convened to discuss critical issues in the acquisition, analysis, and sharing of data in the field of cardiovascular and stroke science. The discussion will serve as the foundation for the American Heart Association's (AHA's) near-term and future strategies in the Big Data area. The concepts evolving from this forum may also inform other fields of medicine and science. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 47 participants representing stakeholders from 7 domains (patients, basic scientists, clinical investigators, population researchers, clinicians and healthcare system administrators, industry, and regulatory authorities) participated in the conference. Presentation topics included updates on data as viewed from conventional medical and nonmedical sources, building and using Big Data repositories, articulation of the goals of data sharing, and principles of responsible data sharing. Facilitated breakout sessions were conducted to examine what each of the 7 stakeholder domains wants from Big Data under ideal circumstances and the possible roles that the AHA might play in meeting their needs. Important areas that are high priorities for further study regarding Big Data include a description of the methodology of how to acquire and analyze findings, validation of the veracity of discoveries from such research, and integration into investigative and clinical care aspects of future cardiovascular and stroke medicine. Potential roles that the AHA might consider include facilitating a standards discussion (eg, tools, methodology, and appropriate data use), providing education (eg, healthcare providers, patients, investigators), and helping build an interoperable digital ecosystem in cardiovascular and stroke science.

conclusionThere was a consensus across stakeholder domains that Big Data holds great promise for revolutionizing the way cardiovascular and stroke research is conducted and clinical care is delivered; however, there is a clear need for the creation of a vision of how to use it to achieve the desired goals. Potential roles for the AHA center around facilitating a discussion of standards, providing education, and helping establish a cardiovascular digital ecosystem. This ecosystem should be interoperable and needs to interface with the rapidly growing digital object environment of the modern-day healthcare system.

Indexed as

Access to InformationCardiovascular DiseasesDatabases, FactualData MiningInformation DisseminationStrokeAmerican Heart AssociationBiomedical ResearchCardiologyConsensusCooperative BehaviorDiffusion of InnovationForecastingHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationUnited StatesAHA Scientific Statementsclinical trialsdataepidemiologyethicsmobile healthpreclinical

Identifiers

PMID26541391
PMCPMC4845234
OpenAlexW2152822288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.