Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2016
Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Efficacy With an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and a Calcium Channel Blocker in Asian Hypertensive Patients.
Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Esaxerenone versus angiotensin II receptor blockers as second-line therapy in older Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension on calcium channel blockers: the randomized, open-label ESCORT-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the effects of Angiotensin II receptor blocker on renal function among African Americans: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Trial
- Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Efficacy With an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and a Calcium Channel Blocker in Asian Hypertensive Patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Trial
- Age-stratified efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus angiotensin II receptor blockers in older patients with hypertension: a predefined subanalysis of the ESCORT-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT).Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overseas guidelines to manage hypertension recommend selecting different drugs depending on age, but no studies have investigated the relationship between drug selection and age- and sex-related differences, although such information may help to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality. The Azilsartan Circadian and Sleep Pressure--the First Study (ACS1) trial was a multicentered, randomized, open-label, two-parallel group study comparing the effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (azilsartan) and a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine). The present study is a post hoc analysis of ACS1 to investigate age- and sex-related differences in the antihypertensive effects between azilsartan and amlodipine. Azilsartan significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure in male patients younger than 60 years compared with amlodipine, but amlodipine significantly reduced systolic blood pressure in female patients 60 years and older compared with azilsartan. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes will demonstrate whether a diastolic blood pressure-lowering effect with azilsartan is significantly effective in male patients younger than 60 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.