Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541181›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Weekend opening in primary care: analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey.

John A Ford, Andy P Jones, Geoff Wong, Nick Steel

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient use of an online triage platform: a mixed-methods retrospective exploration in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Access to general practice in England: political, theoretical, and empirical considerations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  9. Access to primary care: creative solutions are needed.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John A FordDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Andy P JonesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Nick SteelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2014-07-083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeven-day opening in primary care is a key policy for the UK government. However, it is unclear if weekend opening will meet patients' needs or lead to additional demand.

aimTo identify patient groups most likely to use weekend opening in primary care. DESIGN AND

settingThe General Practice Patient Survey 2014, which sampled from all general practices in England, was used.

methodLogistic regression was used to measure the associations between perceived benefit from seeing or speaking to someone at the weekend and age, sex, deprivation, health conditions, functioning, work status, rurality, and quality of life.

resultsOut of 881 183 participants who responded to the questionnaire, 712 776 (80.9%) did not report any problems with opening times. Of the 168 407 responders (19.1%) who reported inconvenient opening times, 73.9% stated that Saturday opening, and 35.8% Sunday opening, would make it easier for them to see or speak to someone. Only 2.2% of responders reported that Sunday, but not Saturday, opening would make it easier for them. Younger people, those who work full time, and those who could not get time off work were more likely to report that weekend opening would help. People with Alzheimer's disease, learning difficulties, or problems with walking, washing, or dressing were less likely to report that weekend opening would help.

conclusionMost people do not think they need weekend opening, but it may benefit certain patient groups, such as younger people in full-time work. Sunday opening, in addition to Saturday, is unlikely to improve access.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareGeneral PracticeHealth PolicyPrimary Health CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAppointments and SchedulesCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionPractice Management, Medicalappointments and schedulesdelivery of health caregeneral practicehealth prioritieshealth services accessibilityhealth services needs and demandprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID26541181
PMCPMC4655732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.