Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541172›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

DNA Editing of LTR Retrotransposons Reveals the Impact of APOBECs on Vertebrate Genomes.

Binyamin A Knisbacher, Erez Y Levanon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Long-Running Arms Race betweenJournal of virology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Transposable Elements and Stress in Vertebrates: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Retroviruses drive the rapid evolution of mammalianProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Post-transcriptional regulation of LINE-1 retrotransposition by AID/APOBEC and ADAR deaminases.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Transcriptome, genetic editing, and microRNA divergence substantiate sympatric speciation of blind mole rat, Spalax.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Binyamin A KnisbacherThe Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel.
Erez Y LevanonThe Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel erez.levanon@biu.ac.il.
Bar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR) are widespread in vertebrates and their dynamism facilitates genome evolution. However, these endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) must be restricted to maintain genomic stability. The APOBECs, a protein family that can edit C-to-U in DNA, do so by interfering with reverse transcription and hypermutating retrotransposon DNA. In some cases, a retrotransposon may integrate into the genome despite being hypermutated. Such an event introduces a unique sequence into the genome, increasing retrotransposon diversity and the probability of developing new function at the locus of insertion. The prevalence of this phenomenon and its effects on vertebrate genomes are still unclear. In this study, we screened ERV sequences in the genomes of 123 diverse species and identified hundreds of thousands of edited sites in multiple vertebrate lineages, including placental mammals, marsupials, and birds. Numerous edited ERVs carry high mutation loads, some with greater than 350 edited sites, profoundly damaging their open-reading frames. For many of the species studied, this is the first evidence that APOBECs are active players in their innate immune system. Unexpectedly, some birds and especially zebra finch and medium ground-finch (one of Darwin's finches) are exceptionally enriched in DNA editing. We demonstrate that edited retrotransposons may be preferentially retained in active genomic regions, as reflected from their enrichment in genes, exons, promoters, and transcription start sites, thereby raising the probability of their exaptation for novel function. In conclusion, DNA editing of retrotransposons by APOBECs has a substantial role in vertebrate innate immunity and may boost genome evolution.

Indexed as

GenomeRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesAnimalsAPOBEC-1 DeaminaseCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyCytidine DeaminaseDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularHumansNucleotide MotifsPosition-Specific Scoring MatricesTranscriptional ActivationVertebratesAPOBEC-1 DeaminaseAPOBEC1 protein, humanCytidine DeaminaseDNA Transposable ElementsRetroelementsapobecapobec3DNA editinggenome evolutioninnate immunityretrotransposons

Identifiers

PMID26541172
PMCPMC4866542
OpenAlexW2135788481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.