Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541141›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Prediction of survival prognosis after surgery in patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression from non-small cell lung cancer.

Mingxing Lei, Yaosheng Liu, Chuanghao Tang, Shaoxing Yang, Shubin Liu, Shiguo Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingxing LeiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing, 100071, People's Republic of China. leimingxing2@sina.com.
Yaosheng LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing, 100071, People's Republic of China. 632763246@qq.com.
Chuanghao TangDepartment of Pulmonary Neoplasms Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing, China. 332966711@qq.com.
Shaoxing YangDepartment of Pulmonary Neoplasms Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing, China. 1594926419@qq.com.
Shubin LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing, 100071, People's Republic of China. lsb9126@126.com.
Shiguo ZhouStatistics Room, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Xuanwu District Yongan Rd, Beijing, China. zhousg1968@sina.com.
Academy of Military Medical Sciences · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for prediction of survival prognosis after surgery in patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed nine preoperative characteristics for survival in a series of 64 patients with NSCLC who were operated with posterior decompression and spine stabilization for MSCC. Characteristics significantly associated with survival on multivariate analysis were included in the scoring system. The scoring point for each significant characteristic was derived from the hazard ratios on Cox proportional hazards model. The total score for each patient was obtained by adding the scoring points of all significant characteristics.

resultsEastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, number of involved vertebrae, visceral metastases, and time developing motor deficits had significant impact on survival on multivariate analysis and were included in the scoring system. According to the prognostic scores, which ranged from 4 to 10 points, three prognostic groups were designed: 4-5 points (n = 22), 6-7 points (n = 23), and 8-10 points (n = 19). The corresponding 6-month survival rates were 95, 47 and 11%, respectively (P < 0.0001). In addition, the functional outcome was worse in the group of patients with 8-10 points compared with other two prognostic groups.

conclusionsThe new scoring system will enable physicians to identify patient with MSCC from NSCLC who may be a candidate for decompression and spine stabilization, more radical surgery, or supportive care alone. Patients with scores of 4-5, who have the most favorable survival prognosis and functional outcome, can be treated with more radical surgery in order to realize better local control of disease and prevent the occurrence of local disease. Patients with scores of 6-7 points should be surgical candidates, because survival prognosis and functional outcome are acceptable after surgery, while patients with scores of 8-10 points, who have the shortest survival time and poorest functional outcome after surgery, appear to be best treated with radiotherapy or best supportive care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord CompressionSpinal NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26541141
PMCPMC4635615
OpenAlexW2163030344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.