Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26541060›Full record

Observational studyPublic health nutrition2017

Prenatal vitamin D supplementation and infant vitamin D status in Bangladesh.

Nandita Perumal, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Abdullah H Baqui, Daniel E Roth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors Affecting Vitamin D Status in Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nandita Perumal1Centre for Global Child Health,The Hospital for Sick Children,686 Bay Street,Toronto,ON,Canada,M5G 0A4.
Abdullah Al Mahmud3Centre for Child and Adolescent Health,International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh (icddr,b),Mohakhali,Dhaka,Bangladesh.
Abdullah H Baqui3Centre for Child and Adolescent Health,International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research,Bangladesh (icddr,b),Mohakhali,Dhaka,Bangladesh.
Daniel E Roth1Centre for Global Child Health,The Hospital for Sick Children,686 Bay Street,Toronto,ON,Canada,M5G 0A4.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDCanada Research Chairs · CAPublic Health Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of prenatal maternal vitamin D supplementation on infant vitamin D status in a tropical region where vitamin D supplementation is not routine.

designA prospective observational follow-up of a randomized trial.

settingMaternal-child health facility in Dhaka, Bangladesh (23°N). SUBJECTS: Infants born to pregnant women (n 160) randomized to receive 875 µg (35 000 IU) cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) per week (VD) or placebo (PL) during the third trimester were followed from birth until 6 months of age (n 115). Infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (25(OH)D) was measured at <1, 2, 4 and 6 months of age.

resultsMean infant 25(OH)D was higher in the VD v. PL group at <1 month of age (mean (sd): 80 (20) nmol/l v. 22 (18) nmol/l; P<0·001), but the difference was attenuated by 2 months (52 (19) nmol/l v. 40 (23) nmol/l; P=0·05). Groups were similar at 4 months (P=0·40) and 6 months (n 72; P=0·26). In the PL group, mean infant 25(OH)D increased to 78 (95 % CI 67, 88) nmol/l by 6 months of age (n 34). 25(OH)D was higher with infant formula-feeding and higher in summer v. winter.

conclusionsPrenatal third-trimester vitamin D supplementation (875 µg (35 000 IU)/week) significantly ameliorated infant vitamin D status during the neonatal period when the risk of vitamin D deficiency is greatest. Further research is warranted to determine factors that contribute to the rise in 25(OH)D during the first 6 months of life among breast-fed infants in this setting.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyBangladeshFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMothersPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin D25-Hydroxyvitamin DBangladeshCholecalciferolDeveloping countriesInfantNutritionPaediatricsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26541060
PMCPMC10261491
OpenAlexW2409144083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.