Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26540571›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Social inequalities and cancer: can the European deprivation index predict patients' difficulties in health care access? a pilot study.

Guillaume Moriceau, Aurélie Bourmaud, Fabien Tinquaut, Mathieu Oriol, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Pierre Fournel, Nicolas Magné, Franck Chauvin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Socioeconomic disadvantage and the risk for adverse post-operative outcomes after gynecologic cancer surgery.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume MoriceauMedical Oncology Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Aurélie BourmaudDepartment of Public Health, Hygée Centre, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Fabien TinquautDepartment of Public Health, Hygée Centre, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Mathieu OriolDepartment of Public Health, Hygée Centre, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Jean-Philippe JacquinMedical Oncology Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Pierre FournelMedical Oncology Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Nicolas MagnéRadiation Oncology Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Franck ChauvinDepartment of Public Health, Hygée Centre, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
Institute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Jean Monnet · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe European Deprivation Index (EDI), is a new ecological estimate for Socio-Economic Status (SES). This study postulates that Time-To-Treatment could be used as a cancer quality-of -care surrogate in order to identify the association between cancer patient's SES and quality of care in a French comprehensive cancer center.

methodsretrospective mono-centered cohort study. All consecutive incoming adult patients diagnosed for breast cancer (BC), prostate cancer (PC), colorectal cancer (CRC), lung cancer (LC) or sarcoma (S) were included between January 2013 and December 2013. The association of EDI and Time-To-Diagnosis (TTD), as well as Time-To-Treatment (TTT) was analyzed using a cox regression, and a strata analysis per tumor site was performed.

results969 patients were included. Primitive tumor site was 505 BC (52%), 169 PC (17%), 145 LC (15%), 116 CRC (12%), and 34 S (4%). Median TTD was 1.41 months (Q1-Q3 0.5 to 3.5 months). Median TTT was 0.9 months (0.4 - 1.4). In a multivariate analysis, we identified the tumor site as a predictive factor to influence TTD, shorter for BC (0.75 months, [0.30- 1.9]) than PC (4.69 months [1.6-29.7]), HR 0.27 95%CI = [0.22-0.34], p < 0.001. TTT was also shorter for BC (0.75 months [0.4-1.1]) than PC (2.02 [0.9-3.2]), HR 0.32 95%CI = [0.27-0.39], p < 0.001. EDI quintiles were not found associated with either TTT or TTD.

conclusionsDeprivation estimated by the EDI does not appear to be related to an extension of the Time-to-Diagnosis or Time-to-Treatment in our real-life population. Further research should be done to identify other frailty-sensitive factors that could be responsible for delays in care.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEuropeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasmsPilot Projectsaccess to carecancereuropean deprivation indexpopulation basedsocio-economic inequalities

Identifiers

PMID26540571
PMCPMC4808051
OpenAlexW1934685320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.