Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26539838›Full record

ArticleGerontology2016

Breast Cancer beyond the Age of Mutation.

Mark A LaBarge, E Lorena Mora-Blanco, Susan Samson, Masaru Miyano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-Cell Analysis in the Mouse and Human Mammary Gland.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Multiomics of Aging and Aging-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Splicing alterations in healthy aging and disease.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A LaBargeBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif., USA.
E Lorena Mora-Blanco
Susan Samson
Masaru Miyano
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Age-related shifts in epithelial lineages and tissue homeostasis in mammary gland 5R01AG040081-05R01AG040081 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI LABARGE, MARK A · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age is the greatest risk factor for breast cancer, but the reasons underlying this association are unclear. While there is undeniably a genetic component to all cancers, the accumulation of mutations with age is insufficient to explain the age-dependent increase in breast cancer incidence. In this viewpoint, we propose a multilevel framework to better understand the respective roles played by somatic mutation, microenvironment, and epigenetics making women more susceptible to breast cancer with age. The process of aging is associated with gradual breast tissue changes that not only corrupt the tumor-suppressive activity of normal tissue but also impose age-specific epigenetic changes that alter gene expression, thus reinforcing cellular phenotypes that are associated with a continuum of age-related tissue microenvironments. The evidence discussed here suggests that while the riddle of whether epigenetics drives microenvironmental changes, or whether changes in the microenvironment alter heritable cellular memory has not been solved, a path has been cleared enabling functional analysis leading to the prediction of key nodes in the network that link the microenvironment with the epigenome. The hypothesis that the accumulation of somatic mutations with age drives the age-related increase in breast cancer incidence, if correct, has a somewhat nihilistic conclusion, namely that cancers will be impossible to avoid. Alternatively, if microenvironment-driven epigenetic changes are the key to explaining susceptibility to age-related breast cancers, then there is hope that primary prevention is possible because epigenomes are relatively malleable.

Indexed as

MutationAgedAgingBreast NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID26539838
PMCPMC4860162
OpenAlexW2239515798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.