Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26539819›Full record

ArticleJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Species Differences in the Geometry of the Anterior Segment Differentially Affect Anterior Chamber Cell Scoring Systems in Laboratory Animals.

Sara M Thomasy, J Seth Eaton, Matthew J Timberlake, Paul E Miller, Steven Matsumoto, Christopher J Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  6. Animal Models in Eye Research: Focus on Corneal Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of trabecular meshwork-specific promotersInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  9. Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Efficacy of a Sustained-Release Bimatoprost Implant in Dog Eyes Pretreated with Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Use of Animal Models to Assess Engineered Corneal Tissue.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  14. Aqueous Humor Dynamics of the Brown-Norway Rat.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara M Thomasy1 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California , Davis, Davis, California.
J Seth Eaton1 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California , Davis, Davis, California.
Matthew J Timberlake3 Sacramento, California.
Paul E Miller2 Ocular Services on Demand (OSOD) , Madison, Wisconsin.
Steven Matsumoto5 Department of Nonclinical and Translational Sciences, Allergan , Irvine, California.
Christopher J Murphy1 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California , Davis, Davis, California.
University of California, Davis · USAllergan (Ireland) · IESacramento City College · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWisconsin Department of Health Services · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LISA M OAKES · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
Engineering the Corneal Wound Bed to Promote HealingK08EY021142 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI THOMASY, SARA MICHELLE · 2011 to 2015
$879k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY021142NEI NIH HHS P30 EY12576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the impact of anterior segment geometry on ocular scoring systems quantifying anterior chamber (AC) cells in humans and 7 common laboratory species.

methodsUsing normative anterior segment dimensions and novel geometric formulae, ocular section volumes measured by 3 scoring systems; Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN), Ocular Services On Demand (OSOD), and OSOD-modified SUN were calculated for each species, respectively. Calculated volumes were applied to each system's AC cell scoring scheme to determine comparative cell density (cells/mm(3)). Cell density values for all laboratory species were normalized to human values and conversion factors derived to create modified scoring schemes, facilitating interspecies comparison with each system, respectively.

resultsDifferences in anterior segment geometry resulted in marked differences in optical section volume measured. Volumes were smaller in rodents than dogs and cats, but represented a comparatively larger percentage of AC volume. AC cell density (cells/mm(3)) varied between species. Using the SUN and OSOD-modified SUN systems, values in the pig, dog, and cat underestimated human values; values in rodents overestimated human values. Modified normalized scoring systems presented here account for species-related anterior segment geometry and facilitate both intra- and interspecies analysis, as well as translational comparison.

conclusionsEmployment of modified AC cell scoring systems that account for species-specific differences in anterior segment anatomy would harmonize findings across species and may be more predictive for determining ocular toxicological consequences in ocular drug and device development programs.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryAnimalsAnterior ChamberAnterior Eye SegmentCatsCell CountDogsHumansMiceRabbitsRatsSpecies SpecificitySwineTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID26539819
PMCPMC4742968
OpenAlexW2105383496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.