ArticleBioMed research international2015
Classification of Cancer Primary Sites Using Machine Learning and Somatic Mutations.
Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary dynamics of early and late mutational signatures in metastatic cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A multi-representation deep-learning framework for accurate multicancer classification.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable AI Model Reveals Informative Mutational Signatures for Cancer-Type Classification.Cancers · 2025Article
- Classification of tumor types using XGBoost machine learning model: a vector space transformation of genomic alterations.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Secure tumor classification by shallow neural network using homomorphic encryption.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection.Genome medicine · 2021Review
- A deep learning system accurately classifies primary and metastatic cancers using passenger mutation patterns.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Integrating Somatic Mutations for Breast Cancer Survival Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- CPEM: Accurate cancer type classification based on somatic alterations using an ensemble of a random forest and a deep neural network.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Next Generation Sequencing in Clinical Oncology: Applications, Challenges and Promises: A Review Article.Iranian journal of public health · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An accurate classification of human cancer, including its primary site, is important for better understanding of cancer and effective therapeutic strategies development. The available big data of somatic mutations provides us a great opportunity to investigate cancer classification using machine learning. Here, we explored the patterns of 1,760,846 somatic mutations identified from 230,255 cancer patients along with gene function information using support vector machine. Specifically, we performed a multiclass classification experiment over the 17 tumor sites using the gene symbol, somatic mutation, chromosome, and gene functional pathway as predictors for 6,751 subjects. The performance of the baseline using only gene features is 0.57 in accuracy. It was improved to 0.62 when adding the information of mutation and chromosome. Among the predictable primary tumor sites, the prediction of five primary sites (large intestine, liver, skin, pancreas, and lung) could achieve the performance with more than 0.70 in F-measure. The model of the large intestine ranked the first with 0.87 in F-measure. The results demonstrate that the somatic mutation information is useful for prediction of primary tumor sites with machine learning modeling. To our knowledge, this study is the first investigation of the primary sites classification using machine learning and somatic mutation data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.