Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26539439›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2015

The Use of Biological Meshes in Diaphragmatic Defects - An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature.

Stavros A Antoniou, Rudolph Pointner, Frank-Alexander Granderath, Ferdinand Köckerling

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Repair of diaphragmatic hernias: Retrospective analysis of 70 cases.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. A tale of two unconventional adult diaphragmatic hernias.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Decellularization of Small Intestinal Submucosa.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Emergency surgery due to diaphragmatic hernia: case series and review.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stavros A AntoniouCenter for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Neuwerk Hospital , Mönchengladbach , Germany ; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion , Heraklion , Greece.
Rudolph PointnerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Zell am See , Zell am See , Austria.
Frank-Alexander GranderathCenter for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Neuwerk Hospital , Mönchengladbach , Germany.
Ferdinand KöckerlingDepartment of Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital , Berlin , Germany.
Städtische Kliniken Mönchengladbach · DETauern Hospital Zell am See · ATVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of meshes for hiatal hernia repair has emerged in the era of laparoscopic surgery, although sporadic cases of mesh augmentation of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture have been reported. The indications for biologic meshes in diaphragmatic repair are ill defined. This systematic review aims to investigate the available evidence on the role of biologic meshes in diaphragmatic rupture and hiatal hernia repair. Limited data from sporadic case reports and case series have demonstrated that repair of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture with biologic mesh is safe technique in both the acute or chronic setting. High level evidence demonstrates short-term benefits of biologic mesh augmentation in hiatal hernia repair over primary repair, although adequate long-term data are not currently available. Long-term follow-up data suggest no benefit of hiatal hernia repair using porcine small intestine submucosa over suture repair. The effectiveness of different biologic mesh materials on hernia recurrence requires further investigation.

Indexed as

biologic graftbiologic meshdiaphragmatic rupturefundoplicationhiatal herniaparaesophageal hernia

Identifiers

PMID26539439
PMCPMC4612643
OpenAlexW2174746188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.