Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26539429›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2015

Evaluation of the side effects of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanocapsules containing atrazine toward maize plants.

Halley C Oliveira, Renata Stolf-Moreira, Cláudia B R Martinez, Gustavo F M Sousa, Renato Grillo, Marcelo B de Jesus, Leonardo F Fraceto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Halley C OliveiraDepartment of Animal and Plant Biology, University of Londrina Londrina, Brazil.
Renata Stolf-MoreiraDepartment of Animal and Plant Biology, University of Londrina Londrina, Brazil.
Cláudia B R MartinezDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Londrina Londrina, Brazil.
Gustavo F M SousaDepartment of Animal and Plant Biology, University of Londrina Londrina, Brazil.
Renato GrilloInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory Braga, Portugal ; Department of Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista Sorocaba, Brazil.
Marcelo B de JesusDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas Campinas, Brazil.
Leonardo F FracetoDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista Sorocaba, Brazil ; Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) nanocapsules have been used as a carrier system for the herbicide atrazine, which is commonly applied to maize. We demonstrated previously that these atrazine containing polymeric nanocapsules were 10-fold more effective in the control of mustard plants (a target species), as compared to a commercial atrazine formulation. Since atrazine can have adverse effects on non-target crops, here we analyzed the effect of encapsulated atrazine on growth, physiological and oxidative stress parameters of soil-grown maize plants (Zea mays L.). One day after the post-emergence treatment with PCL nanocapsules containing atrazine (1 mg mL(-1)), maize plants presented 15 and 21% decreases in maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) and in net CO2 assimilation rate, respectively, as compared to water-sprayed plants. The same treatment led to a 1.8-fold increase in leaf lipid peroxidation in comparison with control plants. However, all of these parameters were unaffected 4 and 8 days after the application of encapsulated atrazine. These results suggested that the negative effects of atrazine were transient, probably due to the ability of maize plants to detoxify the herbicide. When encapsulated atrazine was applied at a 10-fold lower concentration (0.1 mg mL(-1)), a dosage that is still effective for weed control, no effects were detected even shortly after application. Regardless of the herbicide concentration, neither pre- nor post-emergence treatment with the PCL nanocapsules carrying atrazine resulted in the development of any macroscopic symptoms in maize leaves, and there were no impacts on shoot growth. Additionally, no effects were observed when plants were sprayed with PCL nanocapsules without atrazine. Overall, these results suggested that the use of PCL nanocapsules containing atrazine did not lead to persistent side effects in maize plants, and that the technique could offer a safe tool for weed control without affecting crop growth.

Indexed as

atrazinenanopesticidesnanotechnologypolymeric nanoparticlesZea mays. L

Identifiers

PMID26539429
PMCPMC4612713
OpenAlexW2175031120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.