ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015
Insights into molecular and metabolic events associated with fruit response to post-harvest fungal pathogens.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Antifungal Potency to Fruit Protection: Infection-Site Bioavailability and Delivery Constraints in Antifungal Edible Coatings.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Postharvest Management of Fruits: Navigating the Affordability, Efficacy, and Non-Destructive Quality Evaluation of Thermal Versus Non-Thermal Interventions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Metagenomic profiling of bacterial (16S) and fungal (ITS) communities on d'Anjou pears during long-term controlled-atmosphere storage.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- QTL pyramiding uncovers epistatic interactions that modify cuticle phenolics in tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and biotechnology for smart storage: Quality and safety perspectives in horticultural produce.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Article
- Genomic factors limiting the diversity of Saccharomycotina plant pathogens.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Sweet Pepper cv. Lai Lai Ripeness Stage Influences Susceptibility to Mycotoxinogenic Alternaria alternata Causing Black Mold.The plant pathology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Antioxidant metabolism insights into ripening and senescence delay of green pepper fruit through the salicylic acid preharvest treatment.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- E3 ligase SlCOP1-1 stabilizes transcription factor SlOpaque2 and enhances fruit resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Insights into the cell-wall dynamics in grapevine berries during ripening and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.Plant molecular biology · 2024Review
- Ectopic overexpression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Identification of watermelon H3K4 and H3K27 genes and their expression profiles during watermelon fruit development.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
- The Use of Essential Oil Embedded in Polylactic Acid/Chitosan-Based Film for Mango Post-Harvest Application against Pathogenic Fungi.Polymers · 2023Article
- Phenolic-Rich Extracts from Circular Economy: Chemical Profile and Activity against Filamentous Fungi and Dermatophytes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Exploitation of Microbial Antagonists against Postharvest Plant Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Killing me softly: A pathogen accelerates fruit ripening and softening to cause disease.Plant physiology · 2023Article
- Botrytis cinerea infection accelerates ripening and cell wall disassembly to promote disease in tomato fruit.Plant physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to post-harvest losses more than 30% of harvested fruits will not reach the consumers' plate. Fungal pathogens play a key role in those losses, as they cause most of the fruit rots and the customer complaints. Many of the fungal pathogens are already present in the unripe fruit but remain quiescent during fruit growth until a particular phase of fruit ripening and senescence. The pathogens sense the developmental change and switch into the devastating necrotrophic life style that causes fruit rotting. Colonization of unripe fruit by the fungus initiates defensive responses that limit fungal growth and development. However, during fruit ripening several physiological processes occur that correlate with increased fruit susceptibility. In contrast to plant defenses in unripe fruit, the defense posture of ripe fruit entails a different subset of defense responses that will end with fruit rotting and losses. This review will focus on several aspects of molecular and metabolic events associated with fleshy fruit responses induced by post-harvest fungal pathogens during fruit ripening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.