ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015
Voluntary reaction time and long-latency reflex modulation.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The benefit of knowledge: postural response modulation by foreknowledge of equilibrium perturbation in an upper limb task.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Modulations of stretch reflex by altering visuomotor contexts.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Dynamic Control of Upper Limb Stretch Reflex in Wrestlers.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2022Article
- Effects of Dual Task Interference on Biomechanics of The Entire Lower Extremity During the Drop Vertical Jump.Journal of human kinetics · 2022Article
- Translations of the Humeral Head Elicit Reflexes in Rotator Cuff Muscles That Are Larger Than Those in the Primary Shoulder Movers.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Article
- Mechanotendography in Achillodynia shows reduced oscillation variability of pre-loaded Achilles tendon: a pilot study.European journal of translational myology · 2020Article
- Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Stabilizing stretch reflexes are modulated independently from the rapid release of perturbation-triggered motor plans.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Uncertainty in when a perturbation will arrive influences the preparation and release of triggered responses.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Cooperative hand movements: task-dependent modulation of ipsi- and contralateral cortical control.Physiological reports · 2018Article
- Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Evidence for Startle Effects due to Externally Induced Lower Limb Movements: Implications in Neurorehabilitation.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stretching a muscle of the upper limb elicits short (M1) and long-latency (M2) reflexes. When the participant is instructed to actively compensate for a perturbation, M1 is usually unaffected and M2 increases in size and is followed by the voluntary response. It remains unclear if the observed increase in M2 is due to instruction-dependent gain modulation of the contributing reflex mechanism(s) or results from voluntary response superposition. The difficulty in delineating between these alternatives is due to the overlap between the voluntary response and the end of M2. The present study manipulated response accuracy and complexity to delay onset of the voluntary response and observed the corresponding influence on electromyographic activity during the M2 period. In all active conditions, M2 was larger compared with a passive condition where participants did not respond to the perturbation; moreover, these changes in M2 began early in the appearance of the response (∼ 50 ms), too early to be accounted for by voluntary overlap. Voluntary response latency influenced the latter portion of M2, with the largest activity seen when accuracy of limb position was not specified. However, when participants aimed for targets of different sizes or performed movements of various complexities, reaction time differences did not influence M2 period activity, suggesting voluntary activity was sufficiently delayed. Collectively, our results show that while a perturbation applied to the upper limbs can trigger a voluntary response at short latency (<100 ms), instruction-dependent reflex gain modulation remains an important contributor to EMG changes during the M2 period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.