ArticleNucleic acids research2016
Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed.
- bMINTY: enabling reproducible management of high-throughput sequencing analysis results and their metadata.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- bio.tools: an expanded web service for research software in the life sciences.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Microbiology Galaxy Lab: The first community-driven gateway for reproducible and FAIR analysis of microbial data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- BioRels' data infrastructure: a scientific schema and exchange standard to transform and enhance biological data sciences.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- DataDesc: A framework for creating and sharing technical metadata for research software interfaces.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Genetic analysis of cognitive preservation in the midwestern Amish reveals a novel locus on chromosome 2.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- The goldmine of GWAS summary statistics: a systematic review of methods and tools.BioData mining · 2024Article
- FAIRsoft-a practical implementation of FAIR principles for research software.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Deep learning for the PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Using interactive Jupyter Notebooks and BioConda for FAIR and reproducible biomolecular simulation workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- BTR: a bioinformatics tool recommendation system.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- MicroMPN: methods and software for high-throughput screening of microbe suppression in mixed populations.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Establishment and characterization of turtle liver organoids provides a potential model to decode their unique adaptations.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Beyond blast: enabling microbiologists to better extract literature, taxonomic distributions and gene neighbourhood information for protein families.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Beyond Blast: Enabling Microbiologists to Better Extract Literature, Taxonomic Distributions and Gene Neighborhood Information for Protein Families.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Determination of Differential Alternative Splicing Under Stress Conditions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Endogenous viral elements: insights into data availability and accessibility.Virus evolution · 2024Article
- Using Glittr.org to find, compare and re-use online materials for training and education.PloS one · 2024Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
69 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Life sciences are yielding huge data sets that underpin scientific discoveries fundamental to improvement in human health, agriculture and the environment. In support of these discoveries, a plethora of databases and tools are deployed, in technically complex and diverse implementations, across a spectrum of scientific disciplines. The corpus of documentation of these resources is fragmented across the Web, with much redundancy, and has lacked a common standard of information. The outcome is that scientists must often struggle to find, understand, compare and use the best resources for the task at hand.Here we present a community-driven curation effort, supported by ELIXIR-the European infrastructure for biological information-that aspires to a comprehensive and consistent registry of information about bioinformatics resources. The sustainable upkeep of this Tools and Data Services Registry is assured by a curation effort driven by and tailored to local needs, and shared amongst a network of engaged partners.As of November 2015, the registry includes 1785 resources, with depositions from 126 individual registrations including 52 institutional providers and 74 individuals. With community support, the registry can become a standard for dissemination of information about bioinformatics resources: we welcome everyone to join us in this common endeavour. The registry is freely available at https://bio.tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.